Short story: ‘Crox’

                                                                                                    In memoriam John Baddeley

A dripping mass of leaves and twigs slapped across the window. The bus began very slowly to take the hill.

Near the top, in an oval of meeting branches, a horse and rider were visible, reduced to immobility by the distance, the drizzle, and the drops on the glass, as if fixed with a few blobs on a miniature.

The bus growled closer. He could see that the rider must be a girl. The animal’s bright hooves flopped through the puddles and steam fumed from its sides. But she sat completely straight, her head slightly raised, her thighs gripping firmly. As they passed, the boy glimpsed a pale, finely chiselled nose, blue eyes, and short fair hair beneath the helmet.

Lone rider!.. Dare he turn?

‘Smoking a bit heavy aren’t you, son?’ said the gaffer in the seat in front, and moved further off.

Half-term seemed really long, even if they were going back the day after tomorrow. Just a few days off, and you began to relax, to live ‘properly’, to take some pretty unusual things for granted. That blonde bombshell, for instance.

But there was the cathedral above the shingle roofs, here he was clambering down from the upper deck, now he was about to set off into the city centre to do his ‘shopping’, and –

He frowned. Opposite the bus station was the side entrance to a department store. He knew that it had an amazing modern bookshop. He looked round casually, crossed the road, and half an hour later emerged with a copy of Brave New World.

He set off in the direction of the old, unbombed part of the city, where his mother had told him to buy a new pair of black shoes at a half-timbered shop called Hartley & Brown. But then he stopped. What was wrong with buying them from Wisemans, which he had just come out of? They had a whole floor of shoe shops, strip-lit, glassy, and open plan. It would mean he need not go near the cathedral, whose presence he found oppressive. He was already a bit behind, so going back into Wisemans would buy him time.

He walked out of the lift, turned right into the footwear department, and the first thing that caught his eye was the words ‘For the Teenager’ on the wall in a far corner. He made for it over new, seemingly perfumed carpeting.

A girl, or, well, a young woman, was sitting to the right of the till with her legs stretched in front of her, her hands together in her lap, her eyes open, but apparently dreaming. He approached. With a little jerk of the head, she stood up, smiled, and came towards him. She had short, wavy black hair, a thin line of lipstick, and wore black trousers, a light-grey top, and black open cardigan, beneath which he registered small, young, but perfectly formed breasts.

‘Can I help you..?’

She smiled even more, with her bright dark eyes, and looked at him comfortably but very directly. In a flash he realised that she was only a year or two older than himself.

‘Yes. Thank you very much. I’m looking for a pair of black shoes – ’

Suddenly a large, florid man erupted through the curtain to the left of the till.

‘Can I help you, sir?’ he effused, adding: ‘That’s all right, Anita, just watch.’

‘Yes, Mr Brimley.’

‘I’m looking for a pair of black shoes for less formal occasions…’

‘Certainly, sir. And what size would that be?’

‘Nine and a half.’

The man actually closed his eyes, wrung his hands, and cocked his head in ecstasy at the ceiling.

‘We have just the shoe for you, sir. Anita, fetch the gentleman a pair of Crox size nine and half, and make them snappy, hahaha!’

The girl darted through the curtain, darted back, and handed her boss the box. He removed the lid with a flourish, rustled apart the tissue paper, and presented the creation on his open palm.

‘There we are, sir, the very latest in teenage fashion. Crox from Liverpool!’

The boy eyed them critically. They weren’t actually black, but a very dark, night blue. It was matt with sort of contour lines visible in the leather; you couldn’t polish it. And they were gussetted; no laces. They looked rather tapered, and their black rubber soles were fiercely serrated, hence, presumably, their name.

‘Can I try them on?’

‘Of course, sir, of course!’ The manager beckoned him to a foot-rest and gently, professionally fitted one for him with a horn. He pressed the toe.

‘There you are, sir, plenty of growing room, they will fit perfectly. Put the other one on, would you, and try walking about… How do you find them?’

‘Very comfortable. Very comfortable.’

‘I thought so. They suit you, sir, in fact if you don’t mind me saying so they are you!’

The boy ruminated. They were not, perhaps, what his mother had in mind, but you were allowed to wear gussets in the sixth form, and he was sure they would cost less than the money she had given him. And he would be able to wear them outside school. The bloke was right: they were ‘him’, they were slightly sneakerish and mod, his friends would ask him where he had bought them.

‘Thank you. Yes, they’re excellent. I’ll take them. How much do they cost?’

‘Anita, that will be three pounds nineteen and sixpence from the gentleman, please.’

The girl bobbed, smiled with both mouth and eyes, and went round to the till. This was more money than the boy was expecting, but even so he would be bringing his mother plenty of change. He paid. The bloke reassembled the box, slid it into a paper bag, and thrust it out.

‘There we are, sir. It’s been a pleasure to serve you!’

He had hardly walked eight paces when he heard Brimley say something to the girl about ‘butter up’. He half-glanced behind him. Brimley was disappearing through the curtain, but the girl gave the boy her nice smile.

With his two paper bags, he ambled to W.H. Smith’s and bought a German newspaper. He read it ostentatiously over lunch in an unpretentious café he knew, then smoked a miniature cigar with his coffee.

The bus home filled up rapidly. At the first village a bulky middle-aged couple got on. There were only two empty seats downstairs. The woman made it to the back seat, the man gripped the rail and swayed there with a stick.

‘Why don’t you sit down?’ she said to him.

‘I will do, when this cowboy has moved!’

The boy started. He was blocking the window seat. Presumably the bloke was referring to his artificial leather jacket. The boy got up and stood in the gangway. With a dramatic sigh, the bloke struggled to the window seat.

The boy resumed reading Brave New World, which was to be a set book. Suddenly, he remembered the shoes. He put the book back in its bag, manoeuvred the lid off the box on his lap, and parted the tissue paper. The natural light accentuated the contour lines on them and brought out the blue. They were distinctly pointed…and he wasn’t sure he liked the jagged soles after all. Crikey, now he looked at them more closely, had he made a terrible mistake? But no: they were allowed more relaxed shoes in the sixth form, and these shoes would definitely go with what he wore among his friends. No, they were what he wanted. But what would his mother say?

She caught him as he was passing through the kitchen, and exploded.

‘Those are aw-ful! What on earth were you thinking of? Or were you thinking at all in that head of yours? I can’t believe it! I gave you six pounds ten to buy a good pair of black leather lace-ups from Hartley and Brown, and you come home with winkle-pickers! Where did you get them?’

‘At Wisemans…’

‘A cheap and nasty department store! Why? Why? You can’t possibly wear those to school – ’

‘But we are allowed to wear gussets and less formal things now.’

‘Well you’re not going to! You flatly ignored what I told you, and have made me buy you a pair of vulgar winkle-pickers. They’re not even black! Why do you do these things to me?! You won’t be able to wear them at weddings, funerals, or anything else – everyone will think you’re a teddy boy!’

‘They won’t think I’m that…’

‘Well. You can take them straight back. Tomorrow. I don’t know who managed to sell you this rubbish, but you can go straight over there, demand my money back, and then go and do what I told you to.’

Drained and almost trembling, he went up to his room. Dammit…perhaps he hadn’t thought carefully enough before he bought Crox. He definitely wanted to keep them, though. He got out his National Savings book and counted the money in his wallet. He couldn’t afford them, given his other expenses. But he was in despair at the idea of persuading that fat arse Brimley to give him his money back – and he was sure Brimley had nothing ‘For the Teenager’ that he could exchange for them, so what was he going to do? It was an impossible situation. Tomorrow would be like going to the scaffold. Maybe if his mother took the shoes back, she’d be able to persuade Brimley… But she would never do that.

When the boy entered the shop in the middle of the afternoon next day, Brimley was attending to a mother and son and did not acknowledge his arrival. Anita, however, noticed him and smiled.

After an agonizing wait, Brimley saw his satisfied customers off and his eyes lighted on the boy. He beamed.

‘Well well, sir, have you come back for more? What can we do for you?’

The boy went over to the two of them and tendered the shoebox to Brimley on both hands.

‘Er, I’m afraid there is a bit of a problem, Mr Brimley… I haven’t worn the shoes, because my mother doesn’t like them.’

‘Your mother doesn’t like them?’ He was genuinely taken aback.

‘No. You see, she sent me out to buy some shoes and I bought the wrong ones. Now she would like you to take them back and…refund her money.’

‘Oh no, son, I’m very sorry, we can’t do that. I thought you were buying the shoes, not your mother! Don’t you like them?’

‘Yes, yes. I do. But you see, she gave me the money to buy a pair of black leather lace-ups…for school. And I rather forgot… My mother is… She doesn’t understand shoes like Crox.’

‘I see – I think. Where is the receipt?’

‘I…I can’t find it anywhere, Mr Brimley. I think I lost it…’

‘Well, I can’t give you any money back, and we don’t sell school wear, but I might just be able to help you. How much is your mother prepared to spend?’

‘Yesterday she gave me six pound ten and I’ve brought the change with me.’

‘Right, son. Wait here. Put the shoes over there and I’ll see if I can fix something up with one of my colleagues. I can’t promise anything. I’ll be back in ten minutes. Anita, watch the shop.’

He adjusted his tie, put on an important-morbid expression, and sailed away.

When he had gone, Anita sat down beside the till and looked across at the boy. She stretched her legs out and placed her hands in her lap as she had yesterday. In her concentration on him, however, she slid her hands down the sides of her groin. She bent forward slightly and even moved her hands up and down in the creases.

‘Good grief, what’s she doing, that’s her pubic hair, her mons Veneris,’ thought the boy in shock, but instantly knew he could never think of such a girl in that way. 

She leant further forward, smiling at him with her beautiful, sensitive mouth and her dark eyes, which were as wide as wide, as still as still on him. He felt she saw directly, unwaveringly, lovingly right into him.

‘What happened?’ she asked him softly.

© Patrick Miles, 2021

Happy Christmas to all our readers!

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

From the diary of a writer-publisher: 26

7 November 2023
Ukraine must win. There is no alternative, because Putin will never offer a true peace, only a breather before making another attempt to destroy Ukraine as a sovereign state then torture, murder, deport and imprison its people. Many people still have not understood that this is what the madman wants to do. ‘Stalemate’, a ‘frozen conflict’, would be a variant of the same: a not-peace. Despite the palpable wavering in American opinion, I agree with Garry Kasparov and other voices that the defence of Ukraine is the defence of the democratic West and its values, so the West must throw everything into it. Did we learn nothing from Hitler’s predations? It is the defence of ourselves, against both Russia and China, as the latter is undoubtedly awaiting the outcome of Putin’s ‘special military operation’ before unleashing its own on Taiwan. We know that at their recent summit Putin and Xi agreed that they were going to ‘change’ the post-1945 world order ‘utterly’, which means terrorize and totalitarianise it. Russia’s war has been disastrous for Russia so far, but reports from Ukrainian generals indicate that Ukraine is running out of troops below the age at which Calderon tried to sign up in 1914 and was considered too old (45). Yet only outright Russian defeat could remove Putin and give us true peace.

I realised today that my views on what we have to do to help Ukraine win would probably shock a lot of my friends, so I had better be careful how I express some of them publicly. First, if (God forbid) Trump wins the presidential election, Europe will have to go it alone in ensuring a Ukrainian victory; again there will be no alternative, and we shall all have to hike our defence spending far above the NATO minimum of 2% GDP. It would be war by any other name, but Europe could not look itself in the face again if it let Ukraine down. Second, I agree with the White House’s former Russia director, Matt Dimmick, that it is no good ‘drip-feeding weapons into Ukraine, allowing President Zelensky’s forces to defend territory but not giving them an advanced enough armoury to defeat Russia’: we must give them the most sophisticated weapons we have, and which Russia has not, in order to save Ukraine’s young blood and win the war as fast as possible. (Dimmick rightly said as well that ‘Ukraine would be in a much stronger position if all the weapons systems the US was providing now had been dispatched at the beginning of the war’.) Third, we must call Putin’s nuclear bluff (there would probably be a revolution in Russia if he used nuclear weapons, and he knows it). We have been far too frightened of him. You may remember me saying at the beginning of the war that we should have threatened him by bringing a serious NATO force up to the Kaliningrad Gap, and positioned another opposite Brest threatening the thug Lukashenka. We should do something similar now, without setting a boot on Russian territory (that is always a fatal mistake). We have not, militarily, been anywhere near resourceful, proactive and threatening enough. I won’t elaborate.

Meanwhile, communications with Russia have become more dangerous than ever. The other day a friend of over fifty years standing simply emailed me a beautiful recent photograph of Chekhov’s and Olga Leonardovna’s graves at Moscow’s Novodevichii Monastery, with no message, no caption, sans mots, but I knew what he meant. I emailed back this image that we took last month on the seafront at Ventnor (as usual, click on the image to magnify):

The juxtaposition of Scott’s Waverley and Turgenev’s Fathers and Children on the house front is felicitous. On the other hand, as Stephan Roman puts it in his book about the Isle of Wight and Russia (p. 126): ‘Turgenev feared the power and destructive nature of Bazarov [the novel’s Nihilist hero] from the moment that he had summoned him into existence.’ Turgenev was right: Bazarov is a quintessential force of Russian chaos.

12 November
Remembrance Sunday. Always the saddest day of the year. As Owen wrote: ‘Weep, you may weep, for you may touch them not.’ Nothing approaches the sacrifice that they made for us. For our freedom. For our future. Men and women. Ukraine knows it well.

Recent subscribers may not know that between 2014 and 2018 we lived the First World War practically day to day with George Calderon and his set, and we often discussed the experience on this blog. The commemoration of the centenary was eviscerating, and I wonder whether those even closer to it than I was, for example Andrew Tatham and Clare Hopkins, feel that it has moulded their attitude to Remembrance today. For  myself, I can’t say that 2014-18 was a catharsis, but I somehow feel more at peace with the tragedy now. I simply feel that George and his fallen comrades will be ‘aways with me’.

At the same time, the terrifying, incomprehensible self-destructiveness of the human race, and the unrecoverable loss that wars inflict on us, slay me now worse than ever. During glasnost’ and perestroika many Russian intellectuals, scholars and commentators felt free at last to talk publicly of the ‘possibly irrreparable damage to the gene pool’ inflicted by the Civil War and Stalin’s genocide — literally, the loss in mental intelligence to subsequent generations of the Russian people. We can, perhaps, see some truth in that…

20 November
Another sign of age: picking up pristine GPO rubber bands from the pavement for one’s own use. When I was a boy, I used to think the old men I saw doing that sort of thing must be hopelessly demented. But I haven’t taken to wearing a flat cap yet.

26 November
The mention of Walter Scott above was not just felicitous, but fortuitous: we have been in Edinburgh this week and Scott was everywhere. In Princes Street Gardens a massive Christmas Market was in rude action right up to the plinth of the Scott Monument, but the remarkably good statue of Scott by John Steell in the base of the Monument was the still eye of the storm. ‘What would he think of it all?’ someone asked.

I decided to read my first unabridged Scott novel, Rob Roy. It has been an extremely slow read (380 pages), although in places the plot moves like lightning. The source of the slowness, it seems to me, is the very art of Scott’s long, syntactically sealed and rather heavily punctuated sentences, which I imagine are simply beyond the patience of readers to parse today, hence the decline in his popularity. But strain as you might, you couldn’t ever accuse these sentences of redundancy. Every word he uses seems the only right word. The impression is of a great rationalist — a Scottish Rationalist, presumably. His English is perhaps far too rational for us today. Yet that sense in his style of ‘what you see is all there can be, and that’s the highest function of language’, is offset by the sheer Gothic energy of his dialogue in Scots. The alternation of the Rational and the Gothic is irresistible, and often very funny. Scott’s writing seems to me the perfect foil to Jane Austen’s.

The ‘get-in’ at Nicolson Square Theatre, 1974, and the same site today

We also visited 21 Hill Place, which we occupied as Nicolson Square Theatre during the Edinburgh Fringe of 1974-76 with productions such as Ivanov and The Cherry Orchard. The improvement in the property as shown by the images above cannot be put down purely to colour photography. Unbeknown to us at the time, it was an old and distinguished building: https://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/21-hill-place-royal-college-of-surgeons-edinburgh. The young company was wonderful, but standing outside the locked doors of the building today I found the memories of mounting eight productions in two years provoked not so much nostalgia as neuralgia!

4 December
As I announced in May, I wanted to give Calderonia followers a foretaste of my 2024 book of short stories, now called The White Bow/Ghoune, by posting some this year. The last story will be ‘Crox’, to go up on 18 December. To me, at least, it seems appropriately upbeat for Christmas. A couple of words of background may help. Like nearly everything in these stories, it is based on my own experience and observation. A boy in the Lower Sixth at the grammar school I attended fell in love with a ‘shop girl’, as she was then referred to, they married, she accompanied him to university, and they lived happily ever after. I did not know them personally, but it was the talk of the school and town.

A slightly worrying aspect of this story, however, is that, as the sheet from my 1978 notebook shows, and indeed the unfinished start of the story from 1979, I invented the brand of ‘Crox’ 45 years ago, but everyone now knows the shoes that are called Crocs, whose company, I gather from the Web, was founded in 2002 and is litigiously protective of its name. As far as I can see, my Crox have nothing whatsoever in common with their Crocs. But it will be interesting to see if at some point they snap at me. Everyone, of course, will assume I stole the name from the very successful American shoe company, but I have no intention of changing the story’s title, because (a) I can prove it predates Crocs by 24 years, and (b) I want Crox in my story on account of its similarity to crux.

The dedicatee of this story is a school friend who died four years ago. As fifteen/sixteen-year-olds we played Jonathan Routh-style pranks on a number of shoe shops in Canterbury and Margate by inquiring whether they sold ‘Berkers’ — an imaginary brand of heavy black shoe that made the wearer look a berk. This certainly taxed our powers of improvisation, but it also led to hilarity and meeting a number of nice ‘shop girls’.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Edwardian character, Heroism and Adventure, Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cambridge Tales 8: ‘Black Tie’

                                                                                                                     For Julian Bates

Some Ph.D. theses start from a highly specific topic and finish (are completed) with it, others start from a rather broad theme which narrows with time until it is specific. Jonathan Palmer’s thesis was of the latter type; which tend to be longer in the completion. He had begun research three years ago with the theme ‘Culture and Communication in Dante’s Commedia’. By the end of his second year, this had settled to ‘The Significance of Forms of Address in Dante’s Purgatorio’. However, the narrowing of his thesis topic had necessitated acquainting himself with swathes of linguistics, semiotics, structuralism, and even anthropology. Whereas he should have been writing up his thesis in the third and final year of his grant, he was doing that only now, in his fourth year, when the money was running out…

His income came from occasional translations and regular teaching for all the colleges. His own college had helped him by giving him free accommodation in one of its houses in return for being the ‘M.A. in Residence’ there. This brought no formal duties, it simply meant keeping an eye on the six undergraduates who lived there, in particular watching out for drug-taking and any mental problems. On the other hand, living with undergraduates had its strains. If a party raged in one of the rooms beyond midnight, it was tricky bringing it to an end single-handed. Three young women also came and went from the house. On one occasion Palmer had walked into the bathroom to have a shave, looked in the mirror as he lathered up, and beheld a pair of naked lovers in the bath behind him.

This morning, which was a dull damp one in February, he went to the kitchen to make his breakfast only to discover that the enormous communal table had been stolen. An amused undergraduate told him that it was on the roof of a nearby college hostel. He then had to deal with the bedder, who regarded him as her ally and insisted on keeping him au courant with her family matters. Today her son was ‘in the thrones’ of moving. After that, and after the five medics had left for lectures, he was able to get on with writing at his huge College desk in an alcove looking onto the garden. Then there was a quiet knock on his door.

He set down his pen, strode over to the door, threw it open, and stood rooted.

It was Peter Cathercole, the only arts student in the house. He was short, whiskery, with a thinning crown and large vivid nose. He looked at Palmer but did not speak. Palmer knew Cathercole smoked pot, and put his unusually blotchy complexion and watery blue eyes, which shifted quasi-humorously, down to that. But Cathercole said:

‘Hi. I’m sorry to bother you. Really. Last night I heard that my brother died suddenly of a brain haemorrhage. He worked at the station. They knew I’m at the College, so they contacted my tutor, and he told me after Hall – ’

For a second, Palmer was lost for words. He just managed to say:

‘That’s terrible… I’m sorry – ’

‘Yes, there was no warning…no-one suspected. The people he worked with say that one minute he had a headache, the next he collapsed unconscious and died… My tutor rang my parents, then I talked to them, and I got back late…’

‘I see…how awful…I’m glad you were with your tutor. I’m shocked…’

‘The thing is,’ continued Cathercole, and again his eyes watered and shifted almost humorously, ‘my parents are arriving today and I wondered if they could stay the night here, in the front room.’

‘Of course, of course… It’s empty, but I think it’s pretty clean.’

‘They say they will bring sleeping bags.’

‘Are you sure? We could get mattresses, and sheets…’

‘No no, it’ll be fine. My mother will organise it all. They might need to stay tomorrow night as well?’

‘No problem – as long as they’re happy sleeping there…’

‘Thanks. Thanks. I really appreciate it.’

‘I’m shocked, and really sorry…’

‘I still can’t believe it’s happened of course. It makes no sense…’

Palmer returned to his desk and looked out at the wintery garden. Cathercole’s parents must live a long way away. How come his brother was in Cambridge too? How come he worked on the railway? Had anyone known that before? Perhaps Peter and his brother were very close…

Just before one, Palmer heard Cathercole go out. Then a car arrived late afternoon with him and his parents. Before formal Hall, Palmer emerged holding his gown and met them. The father was erect, wore a pale grey suit, tie and glasses, and seemed constantly on the verge of saying something, but did not. Mrs Cathercole was short, bustling, and red-faced. Palmer expressed his condolences to them and apologised for the lack of a table to eat at.

The kitchen table materialised during the night. At breakfast, all the medical students were subdued, moved quietly about the kitchen, and promptly left for lectures. The Cathercoles breakfasted in their room.

They must have had a lot to do. They appeared in the kitchen around tea-time, when some of the medics had got in from rowing and were ravenously consuming toast and jam. It was awkward. Mrs Cathercole smiled amiably at them – to her, perhaps, they were just ‘boys’ – and Mr Cathercole hung back silently in his suit. They were in their own world. They took their son out for supper, but Palmer could hear them still coming and going from the front room when he turned his light off.

At lunchtime the following day Peter Cathercole called to say that his parents had left, having arranged the funeral, and were very grateful to him for allowing them to stay in the college house. The funeral was in three days time. Palmer decided he should go.

Although nearly twenty-eight, Jonathan Palmer had never been to a funeral before and did not possess a black tie. It was only the day before the funeral that he realised he should wear one. He did not want to shell out for one, as he could not envisage wearing it again for years. He hit on the idea of going to see Joe, the Kitchen Manager, and asking him if he could borrow one of the black ties that the white-jacketed College waiters wore. To his surprise, the request was met with gravity by Joe and the senior waiters whom he happened to be briefing for a private dinner. It was an expensive-looking woollen tie, and had to be returned immediately.

The funeral was at three o’clock. Palmer, Peter Cathercole and three of the medics gathered in the hall just after two. The three students wore ordinary ties. There was a very good sense of supporting Peter. At 2.15 a hearse glided past the end of the hedge-lined drive and a limousine stopped in the gap. Mr Cathercole appeared. Peter sighed, and with a droll twinkle said:

‘Well, this is it… I suppose I’d better go.’

Ten minutes later, a taxi came to the front door for the others.

They arrived at the Victorian chapel of the City cemetery just as the coffin was being taken from the back of the hearse. ‘Hold onto the pram!’ one of the undertakers barked at a gangly chinless youth, presumably their apprentice. They then rolled it with a rumble onto the concertina contraption whose handle the youth was gripping.

There were about twenty-five mourners, of whom eight were the dead man’s workmates from British Rail, wearing uniform. The family included two sisters. There was no sign of Peter’s tutor, so it occurred to Palmer that he was representing the College. The three students were very quiet.

The service was the most basic Prayer Book one possible, with no tributes and only a concluding hymn. It occurred to Palmer that the reason was that the Cathercole family couldn’t ‘take’ more. Within fifteen minutes they were all following the coffin out for the committal.

And this is when it hit him. They trundled the ‘pram’ between rows of tombstones over grass that had patches of wet earth between. They had fifty yards to go, the ramshackle thing bumped and pitched, the chinless youth brought up the rear, and he was hanging his head right down on his chest whilst trying to control compulsive laughter about something. Palmer noticed that the idiot’s white shirt collar was frayed and his suit greasy. Peter’s mother was beside herself with weeping and his father was holding her up. When they reached the open grave, it was surrounded by slithery peelings of brown mud. The word ‘excremental’ sprang to Palmer’s mind. The hole was like a drop. Suddenly he thought that the students, being medics, must have seen plenty of dead bodies; but their faces were pale and sombre. Then the priest started to intone and it was blatantly obvious that he said it with no feeling, that it was all cold and mechanical on account of this being the sixth time he’d taken the service that day, for someone he had never known, could feel nothing for, did not personally care anything about…and wonderfully, weirdly, outrageously, at that very moment a plane started droning overhead, climbing above the airport, and its droning merged perfectly with the priest’s droning.

Palmer was appalled. The disrespect of the chinless youth made him want to clout him. The resemblance of the mud to faeces turned his stomach. He could not bear Mrs Cathercole’s loud sobbing. The unfeelingness of the priest enraged him. He had never met Richard Cathercole, he did not know what he looked like, he wouldn’t have known who he was if he had clipped his ticket at the station, but wasn’t he worth more than this? As so often, Palmer involuntarily thought of Dante; in this case his piety, the sublimity of his religion, his art… These white shirts and black ties, the chief undertaker’s top hat and tails, the fat brass handles on the coffin and the priest’s unironed surplice were so tawdry, cheap, phoney, Victorian… It was as horrible and absurd as Richard Cathercole’s death itself.

Fuming, Palmer collected himself and walked back with the others to the chapel forecourt, where the return taxi was to meet them. Peter Cathercole came over and told them that there was going to be a ‘wake’ at the University Arms Hotel, to which they were all invited. They thanked him. The taxi arrived. The Cathercoles were shaking the hands of their son’s workmates in turn, and there were evidently some relations or friends of theirs who hadn’t seen each other for a long time. Palmer did not want to keep the taxi driver waiting, nor did he want to be the first to arrive at the wake, so after a decent pause he and the others piled into the taxi and he told the driver to drop them at the marketplace, from where each could make his way to the University Arms when he liked.

As the taxi bowled along, he furiously debated his position. There was no denying, it would be polite to go to the wake. But he wouldn’t actually ‘know’ anyone there, and no-one would know who he ‘was’. Might it not look as though he and the others were there just for the food? He recalled a wedding reception in a court of the College, where the students invited had disgraced themselves by falling on the food before ‘family’. He winced. God no… But to attend the wake was an accepted mark of respect. Might his presence, representing the College, even bring a crumb of comfort to Mrs Cathercole? He would be pleased to talk to her. But would she regard him as incidental, even superfluous, and not want to talk to him? And he just hadn’t known her son, he hadn’t known him; so would his respect seem empty, forced, completely bogus? Just how many of these funeral formalities was one obliged to observe? The funeral itself was ghastly – wasn’t that enough? Yet he knew only too well that all cultures require a wake, some ‘epulary act’ to round off the funeral rites, to bring closure… Hadn’t Bakhtin written that the banquet following Hector’s cremation was ‘the true completion’ of The Iliad, because eating was ‘the triumph of life over death’? Ah, but this wasn’t going to be some Rabelaisian feast, for goodness’ sake, it would probably be egg sandwiches and cups of tea… With waiters. Yes, there would be hotel waiters in white jackets and black ties… He remembered the source of his own black tie and shuddered. The tie was culinary, not funerary. It was a badge of servility. If he wasn’t actually mistaken for a waiter, wearing this tie at Richard Cathercole’s wake would make him feel like one.

The taxi drew up in the market rank. Palmer paid and tipped the driver, as he had before, they all got out, and the medics dispersed. He took off the tie, folded it, and returned it to the College kitchens. He did not go to the University Arms.

© Patrick Miles, 2020


Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Modern parallels, Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Very Old Cambridge Tales 4: ‘First Love’

Morning placed his misty paws on the window sill and peered in through the latticed casement.

Stephen May (2 yr Maths) was asleep with his mouth slightly open like a baby. He groaned, awoke, and looked at the ceiling. Then, with a heavy sigh, he turned over – and touched something.

Instantly a smile of utter contentment caressed his face, a golden glow dawned behind his eyes, warmth and intimacy rippled through his whole body… The soft little thing beside him stirred. He slipped his arm awkwardly beneath her head and was about to draw her towards him, when (O wonders!) she nestled closer in her sleep, and her lips pouted into a kiss… He closed his eyes blissfully. Could anyone be happier?

In these Elysian Fields, however, he was visited by spectres.

The tubercular pink cover of The Freshman’s Manual of Reproduction, Contraception and Family Planning floated up before him. It was sent free to everyone in their first week. He opened it, and the pen drawing that leapt from the front page put him off all thought of girls for the rest of the term…

Now titles in fat red letters crawled across his brain: NAUGHTY COALMEN – SWEDISH MONIKA 7 – DO YOU WANT TO REMAIN A VIRGIN FOREVER?..

He hadn’t been able to get out of going to one of them with Big Ernie, Pete and the Maths crowd.

He sat in the tense darkness and watched blankly, as though they were the writhings of strange machines… It was more than an eye-opener – it was a thunderbolt. Was that what people actually did?! Was this what was expected??? Overcome by heat and smoke, he stumbled out into the foyer and was sick in a Fire bucket.

Poor spotty Philip Potter. Now his chinless form appeared before him, in graph-paper shirt, greasy tie and jacket, his hands round a cup of coffee. When Stephen stopped going with the Maths lot, Philip was the only one who came to see him in his room – evening after evening…

Not, of course, that there was anything wrong with men’s company. It wasn’t as though he wanted to ‘get off with’ somebody as everyone put it – on the contrary, he gulped at the very thought of what that might mean. But…couldn’t you just meet girls? Couldn’t you just talk to them? One day he had a strange experience: plodding up Petty Cury, he suddenly stopped in his tracks, as it came home to him how sweet a girl’s voice sounded, literally – sweet…

But now the bed seemed to fill with icy water as he slept. He saw all those Sunday afternoons alone in his ‘attic’, with the bells ringing out over an empty city, and one Sunday in particular when he took a desperate step: he wrote a ‘Hello-how-are-you-getting-on’ letter to Fiona Flytes, whom he’d gone out with once at school. Mercifully, mercifully, she didn’t answer; and when he was home at Easter he heard she’d got engaged to an accountant.

So a whole bright Cambridge Spring came and went.

What had happened between then and June, what??? Watching it unroll again in his dream was like flying over endless tundra…

Potter called every evening, to talk with emaciated mien of one thing: exams, exams… And he saw more clearly than ever now that the way he had ‘existed’ the term before had gradually settled into a pattern, then a habit, and then a norm; and he’d come to accept this daily round so completely that he couldn’t conceive of life being any different after the exams, or indeed ever for the next two years…

But he was wrong. After the exam, Withers (their Director of Studies) gave a sherry party.

He jumped in his sleep as the well-packed seat of a pair of jeans thrust into his face – and another… Then the gentlest tickling rose through his throat and nose as he saw Her sitting beside him, in her fawn jumper and flowered shirt-collar, holding her glass in her lap. And he re-heard his first, hesitant words:

‘Hel-lo…erm… Horrible about Potter wasn’t it?’

Yes, there she was as he saw her for the first time! Short, a tiny bit plump, but with the darkest dark blue eyes, such as babies have. He had turned round – and there she was! And somehow they had hardly got onto Paper 24B and how long it took her to bike to lectures, when everyone was queuing up to thank Mr and Mrs Withers, she was whisked away by a friend, and it wasn’t until he was brushing his teeth that evening that he suddenly, vividly recalled her voice, and her small, soft-looking mouth, and understood that, without knowing it, he had been doing exactly what some months before (when was it exactly?) he had longed for so much!

It was simply destiny, then, when a week later Chubb threw a wine and cheese party and there she was again. Goodness knows what gave him the courage – maybe it was Chubb’s claret – but all of a sudden he invited her to a play…

When they returned that evening, there was a May Ball on in the college.

It was quite weird, dodging the staggering couples everywhere – and the men in their black and white all seemed so tall – but how marvellous it was sitting in the ‘attic’ with the music wafting in from below, and agreeing how strange Cambridge was really!

And now the events of the last few weeks rolled themselves into one brilliant, dazzling ball: tea in her room on the first Saturday of term – then the river, bleak and deserted, with large leaves floating down delicately into it – then their first kiss – feeling her warmth against him – Big Ernie shouting out in the college bar ‘How’s your sex life, then, May?!’ and Pete crooking his arm and leering ‘Whoooor!’ – and, finally, discovering last night that for some reason the porters had clanged shut the gates at one – deciding that she would have to stay – and writing out as if in a dream: Dear Mrs King, Please do not disturb. Thank you. Stephen.and…

Suddenly (you don’t meet this word very often in modern stories, but life does still have its surprises!), suddenly…there was an unmistakable knock at the door.

They woke up staring at each other.

‘Mr May! Are you in there?’ called a gruff voice.

‘Y-yes…’ Stephen replied faintly. ‘The wardrobe,’ he whispered to her, ‘the wardrobe!’

She jumped out of bed just as she was, crouched inside, and Stephen closed the door. Trembling all over, he found his glasses, put on his dressing gown, and opened up. Two college workmen were standing there.

‘Sorry to bother you, sir,’ began the first, touching his cap. ‘It’s the new furniture… We’ve come for the wardrobe.’

Morning smiled to himself, turned from the curtains, and swirled off to where another thousand lovers were awaking – or, at least, a couple of hundred…

© Patrick Miles, 1979

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

From the diary of a writer-publisher: 25

27 September 2023
There can be no surer sign of age than picking up litter on the way to buy the daily newspaper… I have done this for the last four mornings, including a banana skin.

2 October 

Mikhail Lermontov (1814-41): not a friend of dictatorship

I have just read in the New York Times of 20 September an interview with Sauli Niinistö, President of Finland, who has met Putin ‘numerous times’. Niinistö says that

In their meetings before the invasion in February 2022, Mr. Putin was focussed, aggressive and well informed, even obsessive, about Russian culture. Niinistö decided to test Mr. Putin by asking him about Mikhail Lermontov’s poem on the death of Pushkin, Russia’s greatest poet. Mr. Putin spoke for more than half an hour. “He knew everything about that — for him it’s Russia, Russia overall,” Mr Niinistö said.

Putin explained about the Russian odic tradition, comparing the general resemblances between Lermontov’s ‘Death of a Poet’ and Pushkin’s own ‘To the Slanderers of Russia’, then examining in detail the madrigal form of each and Lermontov’s use of alexandrines, pentameter, tetrameter and even trimeter. He commented perceptively on Lermontov’s rhetorical devices. He pointed to Lermontov’s incomparable use of adjectives, especially in the inverted position. With evident admiration, he drew Niinistö’s attention to Lermontov’s subtle transformation of Pushkin’s ‘bays’ into a ‘crown of thorns’. Lermontov’s excoriation of the chern’ (corrupt oligarchs) — ‘You stranglers of Freedom, Genius and Fame,/A horde of reavers standing round the throne!’ — drew Putin’s particular praise, and he concluded with an analysis of Lermontov’s impure rhymes.

No, he didn’t, of course. He did none of this. Putin didn’t ‘know everything’ about Lermontov’s poem, he just ‘knows everything’ about ‘Russia’. The event of Lermontov’s famous poem was a trigger for Putin to rant for half an hour about ‘Russia overall’, i.e. his, Putin’s, vision of a Russian empire. I have read several personal accounts of him doing this and he becomes as possessed as Hitler. Angela Merkel rightly said after meeting Putin, ‘He lives in a world of his own.’ That world has nothing to do with Russian culture.

9 October
As long-term followers of this blog know, Percy Lubbock (1879-1965), who was Kittie Calderon’s nephew by marriage, played a significant role in both her life and George’s. He wrote the first biography of George Calderon. I thought I knew all Percy’s books, but our stalwart follower Mr John Pym, who is Percy’s great-nephew, has generously lent me these two small volumes (17.5 x 12 cms) which I had never seen before:

They are in prime condition, beautifully designed and printed. The latter is not surprising, I suppose, as the verso to the title page tells us that the Manager of Cambridge University Press in 1913 was C.F. Clay and the verso to Percy’s Prefatory Note that the Printer was John Clay, M.A. — brothers both to Richard Clay II, who in 1877 founded Clays of Bungay, printers of my biography of George and today arguably the best in Britain!

As for the contents, knowing the period and its schools I was expecting a high imperial canon — say, Malory, Elizabeth I, Francis Drake, Southey’s ‘Death of Nelson’, Carlyle, Lord Macaulay, perhaps George’s friend Henry Newbolt, some ‘charming’ writers, and none of the visceral, more anti-establishment writers from our past. Not a bit of it. Percy’s selection of over seventy writers includes Malory etc but also Bunyan, Milton’s ‘The Danger of interfering with the Liberty of the Press’, Hobbes, Defoe (twice), Swift (twice), Sterne, Dickens (twice), Ruskin, as well as a good national diversity and excellent representation of women writers from Lady Mary Wortley Montague to Charlotte Brontë (twice). I never expected actually to read these two books, but I have devoured them both. The first volume was ‘Arranged for Preparatory and Elementary Schools’ and is 140 pages long, the second was ‘Arranged for Secondary and High Schools’ and is 181 pages. Percy’s notes are brilliant. It may sound strange of a school text book, but it is a masterpiece, to set beside Percy’s Earlham, The Letters of Henry James, or The Craft of Fiction.

And there is a very interesting proof that the quality of his chrestomathy has been recognised. Search as I might, I could not find any copies of the 1913 first edition for sale on the Web, or any printed later in the twentieth century, so I assumed that, mangled by use, they were all binned by schools and it was never reprinted, especially as taste would have changed radically. But in 2007 the book started being reprinted! The process culminated in Cambridge University Press producing a quality edition at £29.99 each volume in 2012, almost a century after the first. Extraordinarily (to my mind), the title pages of the new CUP edition still refer to Preparatory, Elementary, Secondary and High Schools, as though nothing has changed in our education system since 1913. Evidently the need for a really good reader in English prose has not changed and Percy’s is unmatched.

14 October
I’ve been agonising over whether to post my last surviving Very Old Cambridge Tale, to go with the other three. It is called ‘First Love’ and could be construed as dodgy. Actually, it is almost an imitation of Chekhov’s early comic stories, which I was researching, indeed translating, at the time. The influence, I see now, extends to its punctuation, punchline ending, and possibly salacious element (for which the young Chekhov was well known). I have a sentimental attachment to ‘First Love’, however, because (a) it was inspired by two real events (no spoilers, but I am willing to say what they were afterwards if requested), and (b) I ended up framing the beginning and ending with something entirely my own. So I haven’t changed anything in it since 1982 and will be posting it on 30 October. But I promise that the next two stories I post will have been written in the last two years. The first will be a Cambridge Tale proper, the second just a Short Story. They will be quite long, posted in two instalments, and take us up to Christmas… I hope we shall be bringing out the book of twenty stories, entitled The White Bow/Ghoune, in the Spring.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Very Old Cambridge Tales 3: ‘Reflected images’

It was the Saturday of the fourth week of the Michaelmas Term.

Half Term.

As he stepped purposefully from the steakhouse on Trinity Street, where he had feasted on the 10/6d gammon menu, Roger Johns suddenly realised that he had no pressing work to do. He turned up the street and, for want of anything else, wandered into Rose Crescent.

The November air was slightly gauzy – but somehow this made the lamps of the short pedestrian thoroughfare all the more luminously revealing. A couple tumbled towards him from a little restaurant to his left and he caught the ripe vermeil of the girl’s lips and the hard white of her teeth as she threw her head back; while the silk of the boy’s neckerchief and the ringlets of his long black hair seemed to whisk across Johns’ throat with a tickle.

A completely different figure approached him on his right. It was a student of about his own height wearing jeans, an unbuttoned bright red guardsman’s tunic complete with gold braid, over a lumberjack’s shirt, and a grubby green headband. The beard and moustache were blonde and straggly. Behind his circular, gold-rimmed glasses, their owner seemed to be lost in thought. But suddenly, as he drew level with Johns, his head lifted, his eyes focussed on him, and he smiled thinly.

Roger looked sharply away. No, he could scarcely believe it: there was that ‘Cambridge smile’ again!

Time after time in the past four weeks he had chanced to fix his eyes on some university figure coming towards him apparently lost in thought, when this person had suddenly looked him in the eyes – or was it through the eyes? – and smiled knowingly. And he was totally confused by it. Were they actually smiling inside their own little world, at some suddenly seized perception, at some solution achieved in precisely that second to a particularly knotty metaphysical or mathematical problem, at some brilliant aphorism recently heard at high table or a party and casually recalled? The irony that played round the lips as their gaze met his seemed to say as much. Yet Roger’s initial reaction had been that they were smiling mockingly, with a super-subtle, razor-fine Cambridge irony, at him… For although the gaze was indisputably through you, it was certainly directed at you in the first place. Were they smiling at his face? What did his face look like, then? He thought his expression was relaxed, normal, non-committal; but perhaps it was serious, intense, or ridiculous to them? Or was it something to do with his hair? His shirt? His clothes generally?

As he had found himself doing increasingly over the last few weeks, he glanced at himself in the nearest shop window. He veered closer. People passed behind him. He stopped.

In the viscous black pool of the optician’s shop he saw a solid, pinkish, but not jowly head, with tufty reddish hair and eyebrows. It seemed much the same as ever. The eyes were a trifle larger, perhaps, and more owlish, but there was nothing peculiar about that. His blue Terylene shirt collar was plain, but not dull. The same could be said of his woollen tie and close-fitting tweed jacket; even though, he acknowledged, the grey flannel trousers were a bit conventional, unmistakably schoolish. But surely it was the appearance of the others, of the vast majority, that was conspicuous, that made you stare?

As figures passed in the window, he remembered the incredible ‘type’ (there was no other word for him) whom he had passed in the street last week. He was obviously just an undergraduate, but he was wearing a tailored black frock coat, detachable starched collar with bow-tie, a Homburg hat and pince-nez, was carrying an ebony cane, and had a waxed red moustache and a Louis Philippe beard! For a moment, it was like having an hallucination. The type seemed utterly oblivious of his dress and those around him, however, so Roger stared and stared.

And the black bushy beards and military berets, sometimes even accompanied by cigars? The rashes of goatee beards? The occasional ‘imperial’ beards, with swept back hair and gold-rimmed glasses irresistibly reminiscent of Trotsky? Here was a Palestinian head-shawl, carelessly draped round a dirty-green battle jacket. There was a big fluffy Russian hat surmounting a World War I gas cape. He saw once more the undergraduate in Boots who had scrutinised a bottle of shaving lotion through a monocle on a black cord. There, too, was the one who came out of W.H. Smith’s wearing a deerstalker and kalabash pipe…the pink paisley waistcoat and the mustard one…the chap with the stalactitic shelalagh…the formless, long black émancipée dresses…that guardsman’s tunic again…

Among all this rich and weird variety, how could he possibly stand out so much as to warrant that subtly quizzical regard? Surely ‘Louis Philippe’, or Gawain Bumpus-Pearson, say, who had displayed a tendency to affectation while still at school and could now be seen striding about the College in full Regency rig, claimed that as their object and their right?

A very thick magnifying glass, some advertising cut-outs, and tiers of spectacle frames slowly materialised before him. He remembered where he was. He took a last, steady look at his form in the dark mirror, walked on up the precinct, and disappeared into the thickening mist on the market square.

Back in his college room, Roger Johns unhurriedly made himself a cup of cocoa, flipped through History Today, then re-read the essay he had written for next Wednesday’s supervision. His recent ruminations returned to nag him. It was still three months, however, before he grew those bushy ginger sideburns of his and acquired from an Oxfam shop the battered pith helmet in which he delivered his notorious speeches at the Union and hosted the sumptuous weekly dinners in his rooms. By then he was known to all by his second name, Morton, and to the hoi polloi of the University as ‘Raffles’.

© Patrick Miles, 1978

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Guest post by John Pym: One of my first Communists

The first edition of Yvonne Kapp’s biography of Eleanor Marx (1972 and 1976)

Patrick Miles named me the dedicatee of his story My First Communist published here in two parts in the spring, so let me return the compliment with this ‘sketch from memory’ of the redoubtable Yvonne Kapp – one of my own first communists.

Yvonne Kapp (1903–99), translator, novelist and trades-union speech-writer, was the author of the first major biography of Eleanor Marx, youngest of Karl Marx and Jenny von Westphalen’s four daughters. Published in two dense volumes, four years apart, it was Kapp’s magnum opus. Eric Hobsbawm, her friend and comrade, summarised Kapp’s life – taking their political belief as an unarguable given – in an obituary published in The Guardian on 29 June 1999, and for those curious about Yvonne but knowing nothing of her it’s a notably succinct and sympathetic starting point.

Click the cover to find this book on Amazon.

For Yvonne in her own words, there’s a posthumous book of ‘Memoirs’, Time Will Tell, edited by Charmian Brinson and Betty Lewis. This illuminates, in particular, the years of the author’s peripatetic European bohemianism (and subsequent political awakening) up to the opening of the Second World War, and was published by Verso in 2003 (the cover photograph above was taken in the 1930s). Verso also has on its website Yvonne’s vivid conversational account of the trials and joys of an amateur historian researching and writing her first and only full-scale biography.

Yvonne Hélène Mayer was born in Tulse Hill, South London, in 1903 into a middle-class Jewish family with roots in the Rhineland. The Mayers’ prosperity came from the vanilla trade and Yvonne endured (as she might have put it) a privileged Edwardian childhood that took in a class-bound girls’ college in Harley Street and ended at a Swiss finishing school. She neither sat nor passed, she was proud to tell anyone who’d listen, a single public exam.

She was a friend of my parents from the time of my boyhood in North London in the 1950s and, I suspect, closely involved during those post-war years in the opaque activities of the Communist Party of Great Britain, as was my mother Diana, who was also, incidentally, schooled in Harley Street. Both my mother and Yvonne held fast to their political beliefs until the end of their lives despite what many might now regard as the unanswerable lessons of Hungary, Czechoslovakia and the collapse of the Soviet Union – among much else. ‘It was like a religion,’ my father Jack, who was a socialist but not a Party member, remarked of his wife’s faith.

Yvonne was far removed in character, background and outlook from that of the father deftly outlined in Patrick’s story. Here is how she elegantly (one might say, judiciously) described herself on the flyleaf of Volume II of her biography of Eleanor Marx (Lawrence & Wishart, 1972 and 1976):

Despite a varied career – Literary Editor of Vogue in Paris during the late nineteen-twenties; full-time worker for refugees from Nazi persecution during the ’thirties; Research Officer for the Amalgamated Engineering Union throughout the ’forties; and employed in the industrial field by the Medical Research Council in the early ’fifties – Yvonne Kapp has never ceased to be a writer since the age of seven. Her first work to appear in book form, Pastiche: A Music-Room Book, written under the name Yvonne Cloud to accompany drawings by her husband, Edmond X. Kapp, was published exactly fifty years ago.

Edmond Kapp (1890–1978), whom Yvonne married at the age of 19 (a daughter, Janna, was born in 1924, but the marriage lasted only briefly), was in his day a distinguished caricaturist and war artist. Among his many portraits was a black-chalk study of Sir William Rothenstein (1931), the friend of George and Kittie Calderon, which can be viewed on request at the V&A museum in West London.

Edmond survived a gas attack while serving as a lieutenant in the British Army in France during the First World War and Yvonne kept one of his portraits (was it a self-portrait?) in the airy sitting-room of her small Georgian terraced house with its handsome garden at No. 39 North Road, a few steps from Highgate Village. Horticulture was a bond that Yvonne shared with my maternal grandmother, Dorothea, Lady Gough, a widow of the First World War, who lived in the house next door to us on North Hill, a few hundred yards down the hill from Yvonne. Roses thrived on the clay soil of Highgate – and I can remember the two ladies with opposed political views in conversation about such matters as pruning and spray-pumps.

Here is not the place for a full-bore critical re-evaluation of Yvonne’s biography of Eleanor ‘Tussy’ Marx (1855–98) who, in the publisher’s words, made ‘a significant contribution to the British and international working-class movement in which she was greatly loved and is still remembered’, except to say that this immensely readable work of nearly 1,100 pages can justly claim to be groundbreaking and remains, by its own lights, ‘definitive’. Eleanor, her father’s favourite child, led a relatively short but notably full and varied life. She had that unquenchable Victorian ‘need to be doing’ – and among her many achievements was the first English translation of Flaubert’s Madame Bovary (see Vol. II, ‘The Crowded Years’, p. 96).

Kapp was a full-time worker for refugees from Nazi persecution in the 1930s. In this (as illustrated above) she was joined by her partner Margaret Mynatt.

The Welsh historian Gwyn A. Williams described Kapp’s biography as ‘immaculately documented, immensely scholarly and positively hypnotic […] in scores of deft, almost imperceptible touches she brings the Marxes to life’. Claire Tomalin, who was then working on her own first biography, of Mary Wollstonecraft, called Eleanor Marx ‘never less than fascinating’; and Michael Foot, writing in The Evening Standard (a newspaper to which Yvonne contributed as a young woman), exclaimed, ‘Since [Kapp] relies only on properly sifted evidence and abjures all the resorts of a novelist or the Freudian biographer, the feat of achieving so complete a portrait is the more amazing. It is a work of scholarship but also a work of art.’

There were, however, dissenting voices. Frederic Raphael, for one, gave the biography both barrels in the closing paragraph of his review (The Sunday Times, 23 January 1977 – from an envelope of press-cuttings kept by my father):

It is without any wish to deny the epic quality of these things that I am bound to say that Mrs Kapp has allowed herself a complacent prolixity, not unstuffed with sententiousness, heavily damaging to her book’s pretensions to the status of art to which some critics were quick to promote the first volume. There is splendid and affecting material here, diligently researched, enough to halt any middle-aged drift to the Right in its world-weary tracks, but the mixture of grandiloquence and scholarship is not enough to persuade one that hagiography and style are any more happily married than Eleanor and [her partner] Edward.

Hobsbawm later observed in Kapp’s obituary: ‘After 60 unwavering years as a communist, “everything about Yvonne”, an admiring visitor noted, “is elegant, from her literary vocabulary to the delicious cake she offers with afternoon tea”. In spite of all the temptations of bolshevism, in her happy great-grandmotherhood she remained recognisably what her family in the Rhineland would have called “eine Dame”.’

The Yvonne I remember was a short, slightly stooped lady with a helmet of white hair and strikingly enquiring eyes behind thick round spectacles. A powerful untipped cigarette burned permanently between her fingers. She listened intently and spoke only in finished sentences, with wit and irony never far away; she relished argument, but could also, to my knowledge, be extremely thin-skinned and quick to see offence – despite being a woman who had, in Hobsbawm’s phrase, an ‘oxhide’ toughness. She gave abundant encouragement to the young – as I discovered when, aged about 15, I showed her a story of mine published in the school magazine and she offered a discreet opinion on it – it was, for me, a red-letter moment!

One day, soon after I left school in 1965, or possibly during a university vacation, Yvonne invited me to join her on a research expedition. We drove from Highgate to the West End and parked near Waterloo Bridge. Inside Somerset House, then still the repository of all English paper records of births, marriages and wills, I was required to act the hod-carrier, lugging several huge volumes to an ill-lit desk where Yvonne scrutinised the inked copper-plate lists through a magnifying-glass, pencil in hand.

What was she looking for? I can’t be sure, but I think it was some aspect of the obfuscated record of the life of Edward Aveling, the scapegrace common-law husband of Eleanor Marx. (On the title page of Vizetelly & Co.’s 1886 edition of Madame Bovary you will read ‘Translated from the French Édition Définitive by Eleanor Marx-Aveling’.) A few tiny facts, in any event, required exact verification from a primary source.

Title page of the first edition of Eleanor Marx’s translation, 1886

For a few years I had an intermittent correspondence with Yvonne and one of her letters, I remember, came from East Berlin where she was engaged on more Eleanor research at the Institute of Marxism-Leninism. (Unlike Karl Marx’s notorious scrawl, Yvonne’s beautiful longhand was a perfection of legibility.) She was treated by the state as an honoured overseas member of the nomenklatura. But unfortunately, at the very start of her stay, while crossing a street in the drab half of that then still divided city, she tripped over a pedestrian barrier and smashed up one of her knees.

She found her subsequent five-month recovery in the GDR hard to take, and, to her credit, said as much – in private, at least. She was hobbling around, she wrote to me, like the Commendatore from Don Giovanni. Could she please have (my mother reported the request) a copy of Boswell’s Life of Johnson, to occupy her mind and to remind her of home. Later, in her ‘Memoirs’, Yvonne would summon up, for amusement, a passage from Tristram Shandy on the tendons and ‘what-not’ connected with the knee – very much the worst bony part of the body to smash up.

When I first met her, Yvonne shared her Highgate home with Bianca Margaret Mynatt, daughter of an Austrian mother and an English musician father. Volume I of Eleanor Marx is dedicated to Margaret – and she was another of my first communists.

Margaret was manager of the Communist Party bookshop, Central Books, on the Grays Inn Road, where I had my first paid job, stocktaking in the basement and running errands to the Marx Memorial Library in Clerkenwell. Later she became a director of the Party’s official publisher, Lawrence & Wishart, and editor-in-chief of the many-volume English edition of the collected works of Marx and Engels. She was in several ways, and certainly outwardly, an even more formidable figure than Yvonne. Margaret appeared somewhat mask-like, watchful and withdrawn, while Yvonne’s default setting was an open, loquacious effervescence. They were a devoted, unforgettable couple.

Announcement of the founding of Central Books by the Communist Party of Great Britain (Source: ‘spitalfieldslife.com‘)

Margaret Mynatt left Vienna, the city of her birth, in 1929 and settled in Berlin in her early twenties where she became an active member of the German Communist Party and simultaneously a member of the intimate circle of Bertolt Brecht. From Nazi Germany in 1934 she moved to England. Thirty-five years later I accompanied Margaret and Yvonne to a London stage performance at the Saville Theatre of The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui, a transfer from the Glasgow Citizens’ with Leonard Rossiter, like a coiled spring, as the Chicago mafioso of the title. Neither Margaret nor Yvonne entirely approved of Michael Blakemore’s direction; and afterwards as they dissected the performances and mise-en-scène in minute detail (the substance of which, I’m afraid, I can no longer recall – but I fancy it was along the lines of ‘the Brechtian method was not to be monkeyed with’) it was as if 30 years rolled back and Brecht was standing beside us, smiling at the argumentative nit-picking, rubbing his unshaven chin and trying perhaps to get a word in edgeways.

Leonard Rossiter as Arturo Ui, 1959

Search for Margaret Mynatt on the Internet and you’ll see she had some eight ‘aliases’ in her Berlin days and that, once settled in London, she was suspected of acting as an undercover Moscow courier. I’ve no idea if this is true. A deep and abiding regret of Margaret’s life, Yvonne told me, was that circumstances prevented her from pursuing, in the footsteps of her father, a career as a professional musician. (Her father, incidentally, ‘italianised’ his own English name for professional purposes to Giovanni Carlo Minotti.)

I visited No. 39 North Road in 1977 when Margaret lay on her deathbed at the back of the sitting-room. The family GP had recently reassured her, Yvonne said, that no patient to whom she’d prescribed morphine had ever become an addict. Beside Margaret’s bed on a small table lay an unframed black-and-white photograph of the young Bert Brecht. Yvonne confided sotto voce that they’d engaged a very capable Irish nurse to help them. The nurse had asked if she could say a prayer for Margaret. Yvonne, a devout atheist, had offered no objection, but was upset that the nurse had placed a hot cup on the polished surface of one of her good pieces of furniture.

Edward Aveling abandoned Eleanor Marx in 1898 to marry a younger woman under an assumed name. This was too much for Eleanor and shortly afterwards she committed suicide. I once had the temerity to offer Margaret, who smoked almost as incessantly as Yvonne, a tipped American cigarette. She refused with an exclamation of disgust that stays with me to this day. It was as if I’d offered her a vial of the prussic acid that Eleanor purchased to ensure her end.

*

Postscript. Before Margaret’s funeral at Golders Green Crematorium, Yvonne asked me to perform a task of the utmost secrecy. After the ceremony I was to drive to an address Yvonne would reveal only when we were on the road. She did not wish to meet any of the mourners. And no one was to know whither she’d disappeared.

Mindful of my assignment, I sat beside Yvonne on the aisle at the end of a row near the front of the non-denominational ‘chapel’. The tall, spidery, instantly recognisable figure of Eric Hobsbawn, who was to deliver the eulogy, was displeased to be told that I had a very good reason to be sitting in the seat he’d earmarked for himself. I conceded the place, of course, and budged up beside Yvonne. We sat through the ceremony squeezed together, not very comfortably, with me between the two most eminent personages of the proceedings. The coffin entered bedecked with the Red Flag and the Comrades rose to the strains of ‘The Ode to Joy’. (La Pasionaria, had she been present, might have cried from the back of the room ‘¡No Pasarán!’) At the conclusion, after Hobsbawm’s moving and intimate address, the coffin approached the flames and ‘The Internationale’ sent us all on our way. (Or was it ‘The Internationale’ first and Beethoven at the close? Memory plays tricks.)

In the getaway car, Yvonne directed me to East London and the Thames. It would be some years before the district was gentrified. And Eleanor Marx would certainly have recognised the few still working docks, the narrow cobbled streets and the tall forbidding warehouses. We stopped at one of these industrial buildings, rang a bell and ascended an uncarpeted staircase to a shadowy and seemingly disordered artist’s studio. A large unkempt man appeared in an unbuttoned shirt, a friend of Edmond and Yvonne’s younger days: Edward Wolfe, the famous South-African-born painter, now a Royal Academician. The two embraced. ‘I’ll stay here for a week and then go home,’ were Yvonne’s parting words. ‘Then I’ll be quite all right – I recover quickly, you know.’ Yvonne Kapp lived another twenty-two years but, alas, that was the last time I saw her.

© John Pym, 2023

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

From the diary of a writer-publisher: 24

29 July 2023
As followers may recall, I always believed that the Russian Army was less than enthusiastic about Putin’s war — which is one reason he and Shoigu had to use private armies — and that eventually military opposition would break out which would have to depose Putin or be crushed by him. But I draw no hope whatsoever from Prigozhin’s so-called rebellion or the purge of military figures who have criticised the conduct of the war, since all of them are even more fascistic than Putin and his military cronies. These critics vocalise their scorn for the lack of a Russian advance, and call either for greater competence from Shoigu and Gerasimov or more brutal methods of winning the war. If there is a silent majority in the Army who are opposed to the whole campaign and Putin’s entrapment of them in it, where are they? Well, they can’t of course vocalise fundamental opposition of that kind, or they would be rounded up. But in my opinion they do exist. How long will it take before they act? What military developments would drive them to act?

3 August
For the last couple of months, I have been reconditioning old entomological storage cases (one probably Edwardian), and sorting out a set of 417 butterflies caught sixty years ago in British North Borneo (today Sabah, Malaysia) by a friend who was a licensed naturalist for Singapore’s Raffles Museum (today Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum). I relaxed 180 of them when, aged fifteen, I was given them, I set those on special boards, and stored the rest carefully, but I feel now is the time to put the whole collection in order and place it in an appropriate institution. For one thing, it could be very revealing to compare this butterfly snapshot of the area taken in 1962-63 with the situation there today. I should mention that at the time not much detailed work had been done on butterflies in this part of Borneo, which is why my friend was sampling them, but he did not have time to conserve them himself as his main brief was to study the birds and reptiles.

Parthenos sylvia lilacinus Butler, ‘The Clipper’

Identification is sometimes fiendishly difficult, because butterflies in this part of the world are evolution in action, they create sub-species before your eyes, as it were. My friend was convinced when he gave me the collection that he had discovered one or two new sub-species, and I think he was right. The professionals will have to decide. What is wonderful to me is to open one of the folded papers in which the dead butterflies were preserved in the field, and to discover (see above) that the insect is still, sixty years later, in pristine condition including its antennae. Live butterflies are considered synonymous with ephemerality, yet dead butterflies when they are kept in darkness do not even fade.

14 August
Another day in the campaign to put my correspondence since the 1960s in order. I am on archive box 6 and have sorted about 7000 letters up to 2010. They are arranged by decade alphabetically by correspondent and chronologically within each correspondent’s file. I am hoping there will be far fewer letters for the last decade, because of email.

It’s slow work, which is why I can only do it for a day every so often. The letters were already filed by writer in suitcases etc, but there is a lot of official and teaching stuff, which I laboriously weed out. What slows me down with the other files is the need/temptation to read them; and some of them become, one might say, too absorbing. I made the decision years ago not to destroy any letter, however embarassing or painful, but even so…

I am constantly reminded of Pushkin’s short poem in iambic alexandrines and tetrameter entitled ‘Memory’, the last two lines of which I translated back in 1968 as: ‘I bitterly complain, and bitter tears I shed,/Yet do not smudge those lines of sorrow.’ (The verb for ‘smudge’ here, smyvat’, is almost always rendered in English as ‘wash away’, but the image is surely of Pushkin’s tears falling on the writing, which it would therefore be so easy for him to smudge out with his hand or sleeve; the Russian verb is the one used in such expressions as ‘the rain smudged her eye shadow’, not ‘washed her eye shadow away’.)

Reading one’s own past can be excruciating. In the programme for the RSC’s current production of As You Like It, however, Charles Fernyough has a stimulating essay on the subject that concludes:

It turns out that this relationship with our own remembered pasts is central to a journey we are all embarked upon. Researchers are starting to understand how looking back at one’s own past from the vantage point of later life — what is known as ‘life review’ — is an essential part of gaining acceptance of one’s own self and its voyage. Those who are happiest in their autumnal years are not those who judge their past actions from the viewpoint of hindsight, where all too often the only possible response is regret. Healthy ageing seems to be about re-experiencing past moments of crisis and decision in a flexible, creative, imaginative way, testing out those decisions again and understanding how they were made […] at the time.

Pushkin was right: one must never deny one’s often toe-curling past.

21 August
I write off to another publisher putting the case for them to bring out a book of our stalwart follower and contributor Damian Grant’s shaiku — strict 5-7-5 haiku versions of all 154 of Shakespeare’s sonnets. This time it’s the publisher of:

Click the cover to find this book on Amazon.

Like the above, a book of Damian’s shaiku should be small, though not too thin. I have already tackled several publishers, and doubtless will submit the idea to more, as I passionately believe in what Damian has achieved here. He has spent about twenty years playing creatively with his modern, miniature expressions of the sonnets, and the results are witty, moving, emotionally intense, always surprising. A third have now been published in prestigious British poetry mags and it is certainly time to bring them all out as a book. Here is a sample published in this year’s May issue of Long Poem Magazine.

I felt that the publishers of all the small, but good compilations of Shakespeare on sale in the RSC shop at Stratford should be tackled first as a matter of course, but the point has been made by one of them that they would have to print the sonnet itself verso and the shaiku recto, as a two-page spread, making a very long book. Or if you printed two sonnets to a verso and two shaiku to a recto, you would have to use a too-small font. I had hoped that the Shakespeare publishers could rely on their readers to refer to their own copies of the sonnets as they read the shaiku, but evidently not. Personally I think it would be best to print two shaiku to a page and set them out as in Long Poem Magazine — prefaced by the opening line of the sonnet. That, however, presupposes a poetry publisher tout court. Very difficult. A poetry collection can take an eternity to find a not-self publisher.

In the meantime, both Damian and I feel the answer is simply to tell as many people as possible that his completed SHAIKU: Shakespeare’s Sonnets in Seventeen Syllables exists and seeks a publisher. Tell all your friends! Bruit it about!

25 August
Believe me, I hesitated over publishing the ‘unsophisticated’ stories written by me in the late 1970s/early 1980s that have been perpetrated on this blog — I hesitated for forty years! By the 1990s I regarded them as juvenilia and destroyed the manuscripts (except Crox, which was unfinished). Somehow, though, I couldn’t bring myself to destroy the typescripts; probably I felt sorry for all the effort I had put into bashing them out.

Looking at them a couple of years ago, when I was already writing new stories, I saw them differently. It seemed to me that their themes hadn’t dated, and that the lack of sophistication might have a certain charm. So my stories on Calderonia now fall into three categories: Cambridge Tales (written in the past three years from ideas going back to 1978), Very Old Cambridge Tales (written 1978-1982), and Short Stories (being written now). Warning: the next story to be published here will be a Very Old Cambridge Tale…

Meanwhile, our veteran subscriber and contributor John Pym was nudged by the story My First Communist into writing a sketch from memory of one of his own real first Communists and this will form our next post, to go out on 11 September. I assure you, it’s a mesmerising read.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The magnificent Mary Ann

Long-term followers of Calderonia will recall that I had always had a theory that the person who taught George to speak Russian credibly before he set out for St Petersburg in 1895 was a ‘Mrs Shapter’, but in my biography she remained ‘the mysterious Mrs Shapter’, as I could find no Russian link in the Shapters I came up with on the Web. It was entirely thanks to Russianist Michael Pursglove, my indefatigable genealogical researcher Mike Welch, and the living descendants of Mrs Shapter, especially Andrew Jones (great-great-grandson) and his wife Sally, that we traced ‘Mrs Shapter’ to Mary Ann Gibbs, a lady who lived the first nineteen years of her life (1816-35) in Russia and in 1839 married John Shapter QC, the brother of the author of the famous account of a cholera outbreak in Exeter, Thomas Shapter MD.  Mary Ann’s father Harry Leeke Gibbs had had a distinguished medical career in Russia, both in the navy and as a personal physician of the Tsar, before returning to Britain for good in 1835. For the full details, see here.

But until now, we never knew what Mary Ann looked like. I am delighted — nay, overwhelmed — to say that Andrew and Sally Jones have tracked down a series of photographs of the lady at the National Portrait Gallery, of which I think this is the best:

Mary Ann Shapter, photographed 31 January 1861 by Camille Silvy, no. 1989, Ax51379 © National Portrait Gallery, reproduced by Creative Commons Licence

As with most women photographed in this phase of Victorian fashion, the bell tent dress makes Mary Ann look formidable beyond her years (she was only forty-three), but I think I read alertness, intelligence, self-possession, perhaps some irony in her face, and a definite grace in her hands, her posture, the way she wears her dentelle. Just the person, one imagines, to engage at over seventy with the bouncy twenty-something George Calderon.

But that is not all. We had known that Mary Ann’s elder daughter Mary Gibbs Shapter was an artist (which is why she corresponded with P.H. Calderon), but Andrew and Sally Jones have now discovered a really remarkable sketchbook of hers at the Museum of the Home in London that is a coloured and annotated inventory of personal possessions in the family home. By very kind permission of Andrew and Sally, I reproduce below two pages from this sketchbook that have a direct bearing upon George’s relationship with Mary Ann.

If you click on the first, immediately below, you will see in the bottom left hand corner two pictures by P.H. Calderon RA that were given to Mary Gibbs Shapter by P.H.’s mother, i.e. George’s grandmother. On the right, in the middle, you will see a ‘view in Holland’ by John Evan Hodgson RA, a member of P.H.’s ‘St John’s Wood Clique‘ of painters. George played golf as a young man with Hodgson’s son Evan, and Andrew Jones has most pertinently pointed out to me that John Hodgson’s father was a member of a distinguished Newcastle family who did business in Russia. J.E. Hodgson himself had lived in St Petersburg as a child.

The second image brings us even closer to George and Kittie. If you click on it, you will see that the object at the top is captioned ‘Toddy ladle 15 inches long. Gave it to George Calderon Nov[embe]r 1900’. All the captions are by Mary Gibbs Shapter. The reason her drawings on this page are in grey (except for handles) is that the objects are silver — and the diagram above George’s ladle with ‘Lion passant’ specifically identifies it as solid silver.

Although I have seen numerous pieces of silver that belonged to George and Kittie, the whereabouts of the ‘toddy ladle’ are currently unknown (if anyone spots it, please let me know!). It would certainly have appealed to George, as he was partial to whisky. But the most important point is the date written under it. It was given to George as a wedding present. George and Kittie were married on 10 November 1900, which is why I say it belonged to both of them. The following year, aged eighty-four, Mrs Shapter died.

Both images © Sally and Andrew Jones, 2023. Acc. No. 19/2013, Museum of the Home, London

I think you will agree, these discoveries by Mary Ann’s assiduous and meticulous descendants throw fascinating light on some aspects of George’s life and career.

First, if Mary Gibbs Shapter knew both George’s father and grandmother, the family connection was of far longer standing than we had imagined. It was not just a case — as I thought when I wrote my biography — of P.H. and his wife Clara happening to know someone English who spoke fluent Russian and could help their son George bring his systematic knowledge of the Russian language alive in preparation for his immersion in a ‘language bath situation’. It seems possible that George knew ‘Mrs Shapter’ long before he made the fateful 1891 decision, described by Laurence Binyon, to specialise in Russia.

Second, it transpires that the Calderon family’s circle included even more people with Russian connections than we thought before: we can now add the Hodgsons and Shapters to the Yeameses, Whishaws and Franckes. We really have to ingest the fact that in Victorian times it was normal to know people whose families had occupations and businesses in Russia that had flourished for generations. The reason it always comes as a revelation is simply that that part of the ‘cycle’ of Anglo-Russian relations, as Harvey Pitcher recently called it, has not really come round again since 1917. Harvey’s own The Smiths of Moscow is an eloquent testimony to the historical facts.

Third, George used code words in his letters to his parents from Russia for subjects that were politically sensitive, to fool the censor, so was it for similar reasons that he refused to name his spoken-Russian teacher when asked by Russian officials, and referred to Mary Ann only as ‘a Russian lady’? It seems to me possible. Mary Ann’s father, who was obviously a protégé of Alexander I, may well have been out of favour in the reign of his successor, Nicholas I, which has been described as ‘proto-totalitarian’; or he may have decided to get out of Russia whilst the going was good. With relations between Britain and Russia tense in the 1890s, and the high profile Tsarist agent Olga Novikoff muddying the waters in London, it may have been better for George never to mention the Shapter link.

Finally, the new information about ‘Mrs Shapter’ makes one reflect on how much George and the British theatre owe her. Without her and another woman, the young Manya Guseva in St Petersburg, George might never have acquired the contemporary Russian ‘oracy’ that enabled him to translate the dialogue of Chekhov’s plays with such authentic colloquialism compared with Constance Garnett’s woodenness. And clearly ‘Mrs Shapter’ remained George’s friend for the rest of her life. Without Mary Ann we might not have had The Seagull at the Glasgow Repertory Theatre in 1909. Her indirect contribution to Russian Studies and the theatre was magnificent.

I extend my profoundest thanks to all the descendants of Mary Ann and John Shapter who have contacted me and made this post possible. Alison and I greatly look forward to visiting the Museum of the Home soon.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Cambridge Tales 7: ‘The Folding Party’

                                                                                                              For Laurence Brockliss

Chris Hardie and Julian Slawianski took over the editorship of the poetry magazine Helios at the end of their second year, when its founders graduated and left Cambridge. Unfortunately, they could not find anyone to do the same for them, so the mag would not be coming out again.

No-one particularly minded about this. They had had a good stable of contributors, many of whom would be staying on in Cambridge, but four years was more than respectable for a student poetry mag. In fact it was long enough for a magazine to become ‘fixed’ and slightly passé. Poets were more attracted to the fold-outs and slim card-covered booklets of the next wave of mags, with titles like Reanimator, Tilde, and Curiously Strong.

Hardie was a major student poet. He had a range of registers that evoked admiration and envy. His ‘Blue Pagoda’, for instance, was beguilingly romantic:

The turquoise breeze lingers in the porch
and trails of dust snake brownly
through the distant groves of jade
tinkle tinkle the leaves sing
the dry waves
pound in silence on the pirates’ shore

and another opened magically ‘I trust I shall tryst with you in Tintagel’. Yet he could also be abrasively New York:

Oh the blues was in my cornflakes,
Yeah, and sadness in my bread.
I am pinned on the Christmas tree of life
its Hegel tapping on Marx’s cracking window

Slawianski, who had short brushed-back hair and usually wore a jacket, clean shirt and tie, was the production manager of the magazine, but also a poet. His ‘Bedroom’ had created a sensation:

i traced that grey shadow on the wall
to its beginning
                          but fail with
that rainbow refraction
                                      on the white door

However, ‘i am a dead leaf’, which continued ‘shake me off your branch/die and let die/even the cacti you gave me are dying’, was felt to be so explicit that he might be writing himself out.

The exams were over, the summer was halcyon, parties were raging everywhere, so they sent a note round to all their contributors: ‘Helios is folding. Come to say goodbye at Chris’s room, F4 Cowley Court, this Friday after Hall. Some wine and food provided, PBAB.’

Hardie had half packed. (‘But I haven’t done the infantry on your room!’ his bedder protested.) Several trunks and a mattress lay in the bay window, he had cleared his shelves, and there were cardboard boxes and piles of paper beside the sofa. But his large work table was spread with cheeses, grapes, crackers and pâté from the International, he had opened several bottles of College claret and Piesporter, and he had three more boxes under the table. He and Slawianski put on a Simon & Garfunkel album, poured themselves glasses, and waited.

First to arrive were Nick Button and Ginny Dolun, the most prominent pairing on the Cambridge poetry scene. He was tall, thin, bearded, and slightly hunched at the top. His eyes were always far away. Dolun was short, thin, hard-bodied. In her frilled polyester dress she could have been taken for a twelve-year-old, except that her steel-wool hair was greying and she appeared to have walnuts under her bodice.

‘Hi! Great to see you! Thanks for coming!’ the hosts greeted them. Slawianski poured them glasses and they started to fill their plates.

‘I saw they reprinted two of yours in Carcanet,’ Hardie said. ‘Congratulations!’

‘Um…’ Button began very softly.

‘Yes. We made sure they acknowledged first publication in Helios,’ the girl stated definitely.

‘That was good of them,’ remarked Slawianski, lighting a Gitanes. ‘What are you doing in the Vac.?’

‘Er…’ Button started.

‘We’re staying in a cottage in Devon,’ Dolun told them.

‘And then we’re hitch hiking in the South of France,’ breathed Button with a slight jerk of the head.

A.J. Beaton strode in. He startlingly resembled John Cleese in stature and flatness of head. He always wore a black jacket and orange tie.

‘This is a sorry occasion. But I must say, you’ve had a fair run. Thanks for inviting me…it’s good of you. And thanks very much for publishing me.’ He tucked in. Slawianski filled the glasses.

‘Almroth…’ Hardie began. ‘I know this is a bloody awful subject, but…do you know more about Garth Nightingale? He was a first year at your college, wasn’t he?’

‘Mm. Yes, he was. I met him once or twice. A nice chap, very fresh face…angelic even. He was translating Hölderlin. Apparently his bedder found him – fully clothed – flat out on his sofa with his arm dangling. Overdose. He’d definitely been trying LSD. I’m told he didn’t do any work for his Part I Modern Languages, though he’d come up as a Scholar…which made it worse, I suppose. A friend of mine who lives on the next staircase heard his bedder and another one talking in the court, and apparently Nightingale’s bedder said: “He’s back in bed already. He said he looked at the question on the exam paper and wrote: ‘Yes’. That’s all he wrote: ‘Yes’, and walked out.” Dear me…’

‘God…’ snorted Hardie.

‘Wha-what are you doing next year?’ Button asked Beaton.

‘Well there’s the rub. I want to do a Ph.D. on F.T. Tryng and Ned Haworth, but since they are still alive I don’t expect the Faculty – ’

Tryng?!’ roared a voice. ‘Hello you Bazzas…and Sheila!’

Dolun looked at the wall. It was the Antipodean poet Les Gough, a postgraduate who had taken Cambridge by storm and was published everywhere.

‘You can’t read Tryng, it’s like watching television!’

Everyone looked down.

‘Sorry! Sorry! There’s nothing wrong with television: I’m starting a job with TW3 in September myself!’

Dolun grabbed Button’s arm.

‘Come on, Nick, there’s a mattress over there.’

Chris Hardie absented himself to put on a Pink Floyd record.

‘What about Nightingale, eh?’ asked Les Gough through a kind of half-grin set on his face. ‘I suppose the writing was on the wall with those gnomic quatrains of his in Journeyman. “Suicide/Is making the world/Realize/That you’re dead.” Shouldn’t it have been “letting the world know you existed”? And he really ought to have changed his name, for poetical use at least!’

‘Come over here, Les…’ Beaton beckoned to two armchairs. Gough grabbed a bottle and followed him.

More poets were arriving, and attacking the food and drink: Jeremy Trift (disciple of Ferlinghetti), Carol Brookes (translator of Tsvetaeva), Kevin Morse, E.B. Knox, the haiku-writer Martin Helm, Sue Glenn…

Button lay on the mattress with his back to the bay window and was slowly rolling a joint. Ginny Dolun was kneeling beside him, talking at him fast and gesticulating. He ignored her.

Slawianski went over to Naomi Lewis, who was standing in the centre of the room with no-one to talk to. She had shiny black hair, large dark eyes, and wore a flax-blue jumper with a bright gold Star of David on a chain. They had printed two of her poems in the last issue, one of which, Slawianski recalled, ended: ‘I remember/The gift of your living,/The gift of my loving.’

‘What are you doing after Cambridge?’ he asked.

‘I’m hoping to go into publishing. But first I’ve got a part-time job at the New Statesman.’

‘Fantastic!’

‘And what are you going to do? You’re an engineer, aren’t you?’

‘Ah… I’m going into the family business.’

‘Really? What is it?’

‘Cars!’

He asked her if she would like some free copies of Helios, and took her over to a neat pile of them on a half-moon table.

Suddenly, there were raised voices from the mattress. Ginny Dolun had stood up.

‘Right, that’s it, you bum! I’m leaving you!’ she shouted with clenched fists and flashing eyes.

Button exhaled a cornet of smoke and said audibly:

‘Hurt is both a transitive and intransitive verb…’

She stormed out. No-one took any notice, as their relationship was well documented in Button’s poems. Button got slowly to his feet and followed, waving vaguely at everyone.

The party was going well. Les was on his second bottle and chain smoking. He cracked one brilliant linguistic or surreal joke after another at A.H. Beaton, who never entirely reacted. Kevin Morse, however, the author of some modern nonsense poetry, was squatting on the carpet before them, paralytic with laughter. Sue Glenn listened, glass and fag in hand, from a safe distance.

A veil of smoke floated, ash was getting well trodden into the carpet, a long Leonard Cohen tape was playing, and the conversation flowed.

‘…but then came Roger Woof’s article about Tryng in the latest issue of Frank Voices…’ E.B. (Edgar Barry) Knox informed Carol Brookes. He too wore a black jacket and orange tie.

‘…Steiner was arguing that it’s got Feminist posture at base…’ said Chris Hardie in all seriousness to Naomi Lewis.

‘…so then I wanged my donger…’ Les told his audience.

At 11.15 people started to leave. Kevin Morse announced that he had become a bird, and then a dolphin, but he remained manageable. There was an amiable upwelling of thanks and good wishes for the future.

‘What are you doing, Chris?’ asked Jeremy Trift.

‘Don’t laugh, I’m going to be a civil servant! You?’

‘I start at ICI next month!’

Not many home addresses were exchanged, as everyone knew that if they wanted to they could stay in touch through their old colleges. Hardie and Slawianski saw them out onto the landing, then went back in, gathered up bottles and food, stacked the plates, emptied ashtrays, and lightly hoovered.

Let’s have a drink, Jules,’ sighed Chris, grabbing the remains of a bottle of Médoc and sinking into an armchair.

‘Bloody good idea…’ Slawianski lit a Gitanes.

‘The million dollar question is, what are we going to do with the…literary remains? The Poetry Bookshop have got plenty of copies, our contributors have got plenty, we’ve left some in JCRs, but there’s four unopened boxes of fifty there from the printers, and that bale of editorial papers, rejected poems, other mags.’

‘The mill pool?’ suggested Slawianski.

‘Brilliant! You see that old blue trunk over there, with the broken handle…’

The following day, Slawianski came to lunch, they packed and locked the trunk, and deposited it outside in a corner of the college bike shed. At dead of night, they met and carried it to Silver Street bridge. They swiftly manhandled it onto the balustrade with fifty feet of rope through the good handle, and let it down slowly. When it was half submerged, Chris released his end and the trunk disappeared with barely a swirl. Julian coiled up the rope, which was from the boot of his car.

‘So cartons of sensibility fell through a hole in the river…’ improvised Hardie.

‘Yes. Tomorrow to fresh fields and pastures new!’

© Patrick Miles, 2021

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Guest post by Harvey Pitcher: Melikhovo 2004

The house at Melikhovo (winter 1973)

This recollection goes back almost twenty years, but it does not seem that long ago. As I grow older, time does not slow down, as one might expect, but races away at an alarming rate. Chekhov had died in 1904 and in the summer of 2004 a Conference was being held at Melikhovo, his onetime home, to mark the centenary. I was due to read in Russian the eye-witness account of his death given by a young Russian student, Leo Rabeneck, in an article entitled ‘Chekhov’s Last Minutes’.  To almost all the delegates, and certainly all the Russian ones, who had grown up in Soviet times, this graphic account was completely unknown, as it had been published in Paris in 1954, the fiftieth anniversary of Chekhov’s death, by which time the young Russian student had become a prominent member of the Russian émigré community.

The reading was introduced as the concluding item in the Conference, although, as the organiser, Vladimir Kataev, pointed out, it might also have made a fitting opening. Living through those last moments for themselves, the audience was unusually quiet and attentive: ‘you could have heard a pin drop’ was no exaggeration. I’d added some details of my own about the Rabeneck family and knew the text well, as my translation had appeared in the TLS under the title ‘Chekhov’s Last Moments’, so I was not worried that I might stumble over any of the Russian words, but there was one point at which I feared I might not be able to control my voice. This was when the German doctor, who’d been looking after Chekhov in Badenweiler, asked Leo Rabeneck, who was only twenty-one and had never seen a death before, to break the news to an unsuspecting Olga Knipper that Chekhov was not resting comfortably on his pillows but had died. I was relieved when I managed to keep calm and negotiate the danger area. Afterwards one of the Russian delegates came up to thank me and said he’d found the account very moving, ‘especially the moment when your voice broke’. How had he heard that? I thought it hadn’t happened. Are Russians more finely tuned to other people’s emotions than we are?

I haven’t been back to Russia since 2004, and in retrospect that moment at Melikhovo seems like the high point in my involvement with that maddening country: a moment of genuine cultural exchange. Chekhov had provided me with an absorbing interest throughout my adult life, and in return I was giving something back in their own language to those Russian scholars who’d been quietly keeping his spirit alive during the previous century and preserving a part of Russian culture for future generations. The good times in Anglo-Russian relations that we enjoyed around the turn of the century now seem a distant memory, and those of us who lived through them can congratulate ourselves on our good fortune. Will the good times come again? Maybe they will, since Anglo-Russian relations have always been cyclic, but not, I fear, in my time.

© Harvey Pitcher, 2023

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cambridge Tales 6: ‘The Tower’

A drawing by Franz Kafka

A small brown-man had a narrow bedroom, a spacious living-room, and a gyp-room (more like a galley) at the top of a Gothic quadrangle. The living-room contained a fluted white mantelpiece with a gas-fire, a moth-eaten charcoal grey sofa against the internal wall, and a coffee table next to it. The brown-man read very comfortably lying on the sofa, and sitting on it he could eat meals from the coffee table. But when he needed to write he went over to a desk that just fitted into a dormer with lattice windows on three sides.

At first he simply took his books and pad of paper over to the desk, sat down, and wrote without ever looking up. As his essays got harder, however, he would occasionally look out of the leaded window before him. He noted with interest that the roofs on the other side of the quadrangle were a bluish foam-flecked green, like seawater. He took to having a mug of coffee next to him as he wrote – increasingly slowly and effortfully – and when he paused he would contemplate the tower of the city’s main church beyond the far side of the quad. Only sky and clouds were visible around the tall tower, but sometimes black shapes appeared between the battlements, or heads and shoulders moved mechanically, it seemed, along them.

Could he be seen? He constructed the beam between his eyes and theirs. Surely they could see him and watch him as he sat there writing. He kept his head down, but would occasionally look up ‘nonchalantly’ to verify whether people were there. If beams of light could pass between him and them, so could bullets, either way, and he imagined this. He was particularly alert to anything being raised above head-level on the battlements. On days when watchers were on the tower, writing became a torment. He took to dropping onto his hands and knees and crawling across the carpet to the left-hand corner of the casement to check first, with his right eye, whether they were there. If they were, he kept his ‘third eye’ on them all the time as he tried to write. He found it impossible to write at night, as he could not see the tower.

Outside, he paid no attention to the tower whatsoever, even though he passed it on the other side of the street. But one day, as he was returning to his room, he saw a crowd of tourists, including a woman in a bright red sou’wester, queuing by the big church doors that opened onto the pavement opposite, and a notice that read: ‘View city best from Tower £1.’ He had never wondered before how they got up there; clearly this was the latest arrangement. When he reached his room, he made himself a mug of coffee, took it casually to the desk, sat casually down, and casually looked up. There they all were, including the red sou’wester, draped over the battlements and staring into his dormer, staring straight at him, even pointing! With a zoom, he instantly shrank into a little man with a bowler hat on the mantelpiece.

© Patrick Miles, 1978/2022

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

From the diary of a writer-publisher: 23

16 May 2023
The suspense about the Ukrainian ‘counter-offensive’ is terrible. I hope it will last. It winds the Russians up and keeps them guessing. Moreover, except at Bakhmut, Russian forces have been in deep defensive positions for months now, enabling the Ukrainians slowly but inexorably to build up their military punch, and the longer that goes on the better. Of course if a peace could be signed that withdrew all Russian forces from the East and submitted the Crimean question to international law it would be better. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian battle plan has to be as clever and unexpected as possible, and their attack devastating enough to be decisive. Many people think that Putin is finished if he fails in Ukraine, and especially if Kyiv retakes Crimea, but perhaps the days of palace revolution are over in Russia: the new bosses will attempt to keep him as some ailing figurehead to whom they give a state funeral, so as not to rock the boat too much. However, I have always believed that the Russian military hate Putin for dropping them unprepared in this mess and destroying their unity of command, so if they are defeated in Ukraine they will make him the scapegoat. There will be a disabling move against him by top army and security figures, but they will be too wary of his remaining popularity to do a Beria on him.

24 May
We have been in the Lake District, amongst other things looking for the rare butterfly the Duke of Burgundy Fritillary (Hamearis lucina, Linnaeus 1758). It’s not a true Fritillary butterfly at all, but the only European member of the large family Riodinidae (‘Metalmarks’, referring to the white spots underneath which superficially resemble the silver spangles on the underside of true Fritillaries).  And I’m glad to say we found it:

Photograph by Will Miles, May 2023

It’s an exquisite little butterfly, which is recovering its numbers at certain U.K. sites. The males are intensely aggressive: whilst they wait for a female to come along, they position themselves on a perch known as a lek from which they will aerially attack other males, as well as insects much bigger than themselves. It’s often said that no-one knows why the butterfly was given its English name (in French it is known simply as la Lucine), but it could have been by analogy with aristocratic butterflies like the Queen of Spain Fritillary — and no-one really knows how that got its name, either.

8 June
It is now almost impossible to buy a foreign newspaper in Cambridge. W.H. Smith, who only a year ago sold French, German, Spanish, Russian and Polish ‘papers, might have a copy of Le Monde Diplomatique if you are lucky. Sainsbury’s have stopped selling European newspapers, the shop opposite King’s College that used to sell a good range no longer sells newspapers at all, and a general store run by some young Arab men which sold newspapers in European languages, Arabic and Russian, did not survive the pandemic.

Is it something to do with Brexit and an assumption by newsagents that it’s not ‘necessary’ now for anyone to read foreign newspapers? Is it the result of a national attack of insularity? Or is it that everyone is supposed to read newspapers online? (Mind and sight destroying for me, at least.) Hypotheses are invited in the Comments column.

13 June
I have received three new creations by my old friend and collaborator, mature writer Harvey Pitcher: two short pieces of non-fiction with a Chekhovian connection, and a four-act play with, I think, undertones of The Cherry Orchard. Harvey is seeking what one might call a professional amateur production of the play, but meanwhile he has kindly allowed me to feature one of his prose pieces, entitled ‘Melikhovo 2004’, as a guest post on 15 July, which will be the 119th anniversary of Chekhov’s death at Badenweiler.

Melikhovo was the estate south of Moscow where Chekhov lived from 1892 to 1899; today it is a museum. A big conference was held there on the centenary of Chekhov’s death, at which Harvey acquainted Russians with the circumstantial memoir of an émigré Russian, Leo Rabeneck, who as a young man was present when Chekhov died. In his guest post Harvey speculates on an aspect of his experience at the conference and shares with us his thoughts about those ‘good times in Anglo-Russian relations that we enjoyed around the turn of the century’ and whether they will ever return.

Sam2 and I are hoping to be able to put into Harvey’s post a link to the full PDF text of his published translation of Rabeneck’s memoir. I felt it would look morbid if I added to the post itself an image of the very photograph of the dead man that Leo and his brother took the following day after the corpse had been washed and dressed, so I decided to embed it in the PDF. I know the photograph well (as Rabeneck says, it was published throughout the Russian press). However, when I went onto the Web to find it, I discovered that the second image offered was the following one, which I first saw in The Times of 5 January 2018 illustrating — presumably in good faith — an article about tests recently carried out on a blood spot on the shirt Chekhov was wearing at the moment of death:

‘Chekhov on the death bed in Badenweiler 1904’

I believe this image is what in common English parlance is called a fake. My reasons:

— It purports to be before the corpse was washed and dressed, yet Chekhov’s face is not skewed to one side, as it was in death and remained, noticeably, even after Dr Schwörer and Leo Rabeneck had turned the body onto its back next morning. In Rabeneck’s photo (taken after the body was washed and dressed) you can still see the tilt of Chekhov’s head resulting from him having died on his side and rigor mortis having set in.

— Chekhov’s face is too pale. He was suntanned at the time of his death, as Rabeneck remarks and his own photograph shows, and his face was not as long as above.

— I know of no mention in the literature of a photo being taken between Chekhov’s death at 3 a.m. on 15 July and Rabeneck’s return to the hotel room with Olga Leonardovna at about 5 p.m. that day, by which time the undertakers had done their work; although the latter could, of course, have taken their own photo after Chekhov was turned on his back but before they washed and dressed him. It seems that Rabeneck was partly in attendance whilst the undertakers were there, so his and his brother’s photograph could have been taken either before or after Leo returned with Olga Leonardovna to view the body, ‘surrounded by flowers’; most likely, surely, after.

The quasi-byline on the Pinterest version of the above image reads in Russian: ‘Poets, Rare photographs, Conceptual photograph’ (sic). ‘Conceptual photography’, I discover from the Web, ‘uses images to transmit abstract ideas […] bringing a new meaning to photography that transcends its use for portraiture, landscapes and snapshots.’ Is the image a ‘conceptual photograph’, then? I think we should be told, before too many people follow The Times and believe it is an historical document.

Incidentally, the tall object on the bedside table in this image might be thought to be the bottle of champagne from which Chekhov drank his final glass, and which was indeed placed on the bedside table; but closer inspection shows it is a candlestick with something square, looking perhaps like a label, at its base.

17 June
The advance at Zaporizhzhia is bitter and bloody… I cannot help feeling the Ukrainians have massive blows in reserve, but their commanders’ biggest asset is flexibility, their ability to adapt tactics, think outside the box, and surprise. The Russian army, created by stultifying autocracy, can never compete with that.

In 1992 the then liberal newspaper Moskovskii komsomolets published a Russian poem written by me in Moscow in 1970 and called me ‘a great friend of Russia’. So I am: of all that is good in the life and culture of the Russian people. Laughably, Putin and his accomplices accuse the West of ‘wanting to destroy Russia as a country’. No, it is they who are destroying the Russia I am talking about and believe in.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Short story (concluded): ‘My First Communist’

In the Easter holidays Peter went on a skiing trip to Switzerland organised by the headmaster. I could have gone myself, but my parents didn’t have the money. Privately, I was intrigued that the Freres could afford it either, but what bemused my friends was that ‘Frere’ was going at all, as he was notoriously unathletic, ungainly and accident-prone.

Sure enough, he was skiing down a slope on the second day, went over ‘a bump’, as someone put it, and broke both of his shins. It was the high point of the school trip. He got emergency care in Switzerland, then flew home on a stretcher with the rest of the group, the centre of attention. I was soon told by my mother that Peter was in bed at home recovering, and that I ought to go and see him.

Joy Frere opened the front door. I was bearing a bag of grapes and a bottle of Lucozade. I noticed immediately that the door to the front room was closed.

‘Go up,’ she said, ‘Peter will be pleased to see you. Helen is there.’ Helen? Helen? Who is Helen? I asked myself. ‘By the way, the tortoises are out now, if you would like to see them when you leave.’

I went up onto the dark landing and could see that the door to Peter’s bedroom was ajar. He was lying in bed with his head on the pillow, looking exhausted but smiling beatifically (there is no other word for it). With his right hand he was lightly caressing the hair and face of someone presumably bent towards him, and he was talking. I flattened myself against the wall and listened.

‘…a time completely different from now, Helen. The police, the army and the bureaucracy will have been abolished, probably there will be no money, just movements of numbers, not through banks, but electrically… Everyone will be made to have free education provided by the state, and there will be no marriage and family as we know them today. There will be free development of each for the development of all! And this council estate will give way to beautiful communal homes, high and perhaps made of glass, with fountains playing…’

I decided I’d heard enough, and didn’t want to be caught eavesdropping by Peter’s mother, so I went up to the door, knocked, waited for the patient to say ‘Yes?’, and entered.

The B.O. was powerful and I was flabbergasted by what I saw. It was Helen Minter, the most attractive girl on the estate, and probably a year older than Peter, sitting on the stool by the window, but right up against Peter’s bed. She had evidently straightened up as soon as I knocked, and was not in the least embarrassed.

‘Ah, Martin,’ said Peter without moving a muscle, as though on his death bed. ‘Do you know Helen?’

Well, of course I knew who she was, but I had never dared speak to her. She had a rather long, sculpted face, pale skin, shoulder-length fair hair and smoky-blue eyes, and if you passed her in the street she would always beam a smile at you that made you go weak in the bladder. She performed this now, said ‘Hello…’ to me softly, and vacated the stool.

‘I must go, Peter,’ she announced.

‘I suppose you must, Helen…’ Peter drawled very quietly, smiling wanly and yearningly from his pillow. She emerged from the side of the bed and I took her place. She kept her eyes on Peter as she moved round the room, then lingered by the door, nodded, and left.

After presenting my wares and discussing Peter’s medical condition, I blurted out: ‘That was Helen Minter. Helen Minter! What on earth was she doing here?’

‘She’s a dear girl… You know, don’t you, that they live four doors away? They are terribly Christian. She heard that I was laid up, and decided she must visit the sick – that’s what she told my mother.’

I suddenly noticed that the Russian alphabet had been replaced by a colour portrait of Lenin with a spotted tie. The spots were strangely intimidating.

‘Does she come to see you very often?’

‘About every two days, and always on a Sunday afternoon.’

‘Does she stay long?’

‘Just over an hour. We talk about this and that, and she holds my hand. I must say, it’s rather nice when she lies next to me on the eiderdown and stares into my face… We have never kissed, you understand.’

He paused, pulled a smile at me, and froze it.

Almost in a state of shock, I cut my visit to a minimum. For politeness’ sake, I found Mrs Frere in the kitchen and cast my eyes over the tortoises. Despite the April sun, they weren’t exactly active. The biggest one was standing high on his front legs with his neck stretched out so far it looked as though he was hoping to fly forth from his shell. There was lettuce scattered about, but none of them was eating it.

When I was clear of the Freres’ house, I just stood on the pavement, did a rictal double take, and guffawed three times hollowly.

Helen Minter lay next to Peter Frere on his bed holding his hand and gazing into his face? How? Why? What could she see in him, the biggest gink in the school?! Greying hair, eyes and lashes like a woman’s, gawky limbs, a chisel chin… I was madly jealous. Was it remotely possible that she was doing this out of Christian charity? Doubtless that was the official reason, just as my own mother had told me I ‘ought’ to visit Peter that day. But there had to be more to it, if she was not resisting him stroking her face… How long would it last, I asked myself? Would she become his ‘girl friend’ when he recovered? Should I take to my bed myself?

I was adamant, of course, that I could not visit Peter again all the time Helen was calling. But I did not have to: within a fortnight, he was hobbling round the estate on crutches with Helen assisting him. From my bedroom window I saw them progressing slowly from ‘the top’ in full sight of all the houses in the avenue. She was wearing a blue shirt and some kind of apron dress over the top of it. I honestly thought for a moment that she had dressed up to be nurse to Peter’s wounded war hero and they expected a round of applause. Ten days later, I was walking ‘up the top’ myself, to see my grandmother, when they suddenly appeared round the corner coming towards me on the other side of the road. Peter had thrown away one of his crutches, Helen was dressed normally, tastefully, as befitted a girl attending an exclusive school, and she was clinging to his free arm. I swear Peter slowed down and walked more ‘painfully’ when he saw me. As they drew level, they both smiled sweetly but said nothing. I nodded and half waved, as though in a hurry…

How it all turned out, I never discovered. I never visited the Freres’ house again, I was aware that Peter would be concentrating on his ‘O’ Levels that summer, or should be, and I finally lost touch. I can’t continue the chronology, so to speak. It’s almost sixty years ago now and I only remember isolated events and gossip.

Peter got five ‘O’ Levels, but they were good enough for him to go into the Science Lower Sixth. In the autumn term I saw him once or twice at school looking really quite normal (his height blended better with his being a sixth-former), and even wearing a boater. Then the hilarious, but essentially rather serious news went round the school that he had been arrested for obstruction whilst distributing leaflets at a demonstration by miners from the local collieries. I think what struck us, in the Fifth Form, was that at seventeen Peter Frere was behaving as though he was an adult. This left one with a rather uncomfortable feeling, akin to the apprehension that Helen Minter had lain on his bed in that foetid bedroom.

The last time I ever saw him must have been the following summer. I bumped into him on the street wearing normal clothes and looking nearly thirty. We stopped and stood quite apart. He did not cock his head on one side as he talked to me, and seemed even more self-contained than usual.

‘How are you doing at that school?’ he asked.

‘Oh, you know… Grinding for ‘O’ Levels. How’s yourself?’

I suddenly realised he must have left and I had not noticed.

‘I suppose you heard, I had to leave. I’ve got a job at a small engineering firm, Walter Hendersons, between here and Blurbury. It’s very good. I go every day by bus.’

In retrospect, it looks as though things went rapidly downhill from then on. Peter’s father died later that year. My parents took the local paper, but I never read it. However, a photo of Mr ‘Reg’ Frere in his black jacket, waistcoat and tie caught my attention in the paper on the back of an armchair. I read that he had joined the Communist Party in 1920, was a high-up in the Amalgamated Engineering Union, and had worked closely with the NUM in the coalfield. One day I was passing the Freres’ house on the corner and noticed it was empty. Mrs Frere, my mother told me, had moved to Blurbury to live with Peter, who was engaged to someone he had met at work. Then Mrs Frere died. Apparently she had always had blood pressure problems, which did not surprise me as she often presented ‘apple cheeks’. Peter did not present them, but I remember wondering whether at this rate he might be next, given his general sicklinesss and physique similar to his mother’s. But I later heard that he was married and living in London. At nineteen, so I was told, Helen Minter married an estate agent ‘with a sports car’ and moved to Brighton.

I survived the Lower and Upper Sixth and went on to University to read Zoology. This, of course, was common knowledge to all my parents’ friends. One of them, a woman who did am-dram with my mother, opened an artist’s and stationery shop in the old part of the town and I went to it one summer when I was home, to buy some tubes of water colour. It was a long, wood-lined, rather dark room, but the far end was all glass facing a radiant garden. The proprietress, Eileen, was very affable, and after I had paid she said to me, ‘Would you like to see our tortoises?’ Obviously, I was mildly surprised – and assented.

The light glowed more and more golden in the garden as we approached the glass door into it. I saw at once that it was a sun trap. It was completely enclosed and mature trees bowed inwards from its feather-edge fence, with a rich border of flowers in front of them, a rockery to one side, even a small fountain playing at the back. And there, on a not over-mown lawn, were the tortoises…the Freres’ tortoises! I observed and counted them, and there could be no doubt about it. The big two looked as old as ever, the yellow one as small. None of them had changed, and yet they were noticeably more active than they had been at Peter’s. The biggest was striding around the garden occasionally stopping and looking up at the sun. The second biggest was tearing a beef tomato apart with its front claws. The medium-sized three were circulating from one form of food to another – lettuce, strawberries, even a small heap of pink rose petals was provided. In a recess between two large lavender bushes in the border there was a wooden house for them all. We had entered leaving the glass door open, but none of them made any attempt to escape. As I watched, the yellow tortoise set off for the fountain, climbed into the shallow dish beneath it, and sat there drinking and sunbathing. It was Utopia.

© Patrick Miles, 2023

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Short story: ‘My First Communist’

                                                                                                 For John Pym

The stars! How clear the night sky was then, when we moved into the still unfinished council estate, how deeply dark, and how bright the stars! On a cold winter’s night, you almost gasped when you saw Orion hanging there, magnificent, or, rather, striding across the universe, so in your face; whilst Rigel and Betelgeuse, or nearby Aldebaran, or Capella and Procyon, threw such long, steely shafts of light that they actually seemed close, seemed to be watching, or even watching over, or even communicating with the boy observer! I soon transferred the star-charts on the end-papers of The Golden Book of Astronomy to the heavens overhead. And then I got a two-and-a-half-inch refractor telescope. Poking it through a tall rose trellis between our house and the next, I followed after sunset the mysterious phases of brilliant Venus. I could discern the rings of Saturn, and discovered tiny glinting moons next to Jupiter. I peered into the Pleiades and tried to count how many ‘sisters’ it really had. Gradually I found nebulae and the great cartwheel galaxy of Andromeda – so clearly a galaxy, so clearly remote beyond imagining…and I stared at it through my telescope for minutes at a time, in awe that it was just like our own Milky Way yet only one of numberless galaxies… Although it was risky, I also tied layers of red cellophane over the eyepiece and squinted at the Sun. I could clearly see the burns on its face and great flaring prominences like hair, that dwarfed the Earth. I longed for a comet. Yet nothing, actually, could have compared with that simple experience, night after night, of the whole universe lying out there before me, of looking millions and billions of miles into its depths, and into time, yet knowing there was no end to it (and the idea of that endless void was depressing). The stars…the stars…the panoply of ‘our’ stars… Truly, they were the Firmament of Wonder to me.

In those days, hardly any astronomy was taught in schools. A girl at primary school who was keen on astronomy, and had been to the Planetarium in London, was obliged to show a teacher one of her books before he would believe that the Sun is only a ‘small’ star. At secondary school, I was the only person I knew whose hobby was astronomy, and I kept the fact to myself.

I was astonished, then, to see in the creative section of the school magazine a long piece entitled ‘Our Solar System’. In construction it was rather basic, even simple-minded. It began with a general descriptive paragraph, then went through the planets one by one, starting with Mercury and devoting three or four lines to each. These invariably began ‘X is the Nth planet and Y million miles from the Sun’. It looked boring on the page, but the string of figures given for each planet – diameter, density, rotation, length of year etc – was impressive.

It was written by someone in the class above me called Peter Frere. I had never spoken to him, but knew who he was because ‘Frere’ was the tallest boy in his form, if not the school. He was thin and subliminally gawky. His legs were incredibly long, his stomach rather hollow, his chest broad and quite deep, his neck thin, and his face cavernous. There was no mistaking that his rather coarse hair was greying. The eye sockets beneath it were enormous, but his eyes were so large and blue, with long lashes, that they seemed like a woman’s. His face was always pale. It tapered to a small, hard chin.

I gathered that Peter Frere lived on a corner in the oldest part of the council estate, so I waited outside the school one day for him to appear on his way home and casually joined him. No introduction seemed needed; I plunged straight in and congratulated him on his article.

‘Hm…’ he said, cocking his head at me slightly quizzically, flickering his eyelashes in a disarming smile, and holding a finger and thumb in the air. ‘It’s important for people to have the data. Did you know that Jupiter is big enough to contain over 1300 globes the size of Earth?’

‘No, I didn’t!’ I exclaimed in amazement at Frere’s knowledge.

As we walked along, he entertained me, between pauses, with a series of facts – usually statistics – which he introduced with the same words, ‘Did you know?’. I remember, for instance, hearing from him for the first time that an American rocket had recently passed close to Venus and reported that the planet’s rotation was ten times slower than previously thought and ‘retrograde’, i.e. ‘the wrong way’. Peter was sceptical, however, about the Americans’ data.

‘The Russians are much more likely to be accurate. Did you know that they estimate the number of asteroids at 200,000, whereas everyone else thinks it’s about 40,000?’

Again, this was completely news to me. I suddenly realised as Frere was talking, that he had already started shaving – and the light stubble on his cheeks was silver. Although only fifteen, he seemed older. Everything about him, including his woman’s eyes, seemed much older.

We carried on walking to his house and talk turned to the Moon.

‘Did you know that in 1958 a Russian astronomer at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory witnessed a volcanic disturbance inside a crater on the Moon?’

‘That’s incredible! No, I didn’t…’

‘Not to mention, of course, that in 1959 the Russians photographed the other side of the Moon for the first time, from Lunik Three.’

‘Yes. It was a strange photo, wasn’t it? You know, you just saw these big holes in it, like cheese.’

‘Ye-s – yes!’ said Peter, smiling broadly again and raising his finger and thumb. ‘But before long the Russians will be landing on the Moon. That is Khrushchev’s plan. Sorry, Khrushchov’s N.S. Khrushchov. Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchov…’

I was impressed by this precise enunciation of the Russian leader’s full name, but bemused. Peter bestowed on me a stream of figures about the heights of mountains and dimensions of craters, then commented casually:

‘The best time to look at the Moon, of course, is at the Quarters.’

We had reached his house.

‘Do you have a telescope?’ I asked him.

‘Yes, my father bought me one. You must come and see it…’ He looked down on me from his height, cocking his head to one side and addressing me as his junior. ‘I can’t invite you in now, as I’ve got to do my homework.’

It was a day in mid-January when I ‘went round’ to the Freres’ house for the first time. I knocked on the front door, was admitted by Peter, and directed by his outstretched arm straight into the front room to meet his father.

I was a bit taken aback at first that Mr Frere was so old (he was probably in his late sixties). As we entered, he put down his newspaper, which I could not help noticing was the Daily Worker. He was sitting in an armchair in the corner of the room next to the window. The most arresting thing in his vicinity was a brightly lit aquarium with tropical fish sailing about in it. On the other side of the room a coal fire was burning and there was a television. He was wearing thick-framed glasses, a black jacket, flannel trousers, waistcoat, white shirt and tartan tie. There was a stick on each arm of his chair, and a mug of tea on a table beside him. He was evidently quite a short man, jovial, with more than a passing resemblance to Arthur Askey.

Peter announced me with a histrionic gesture.

‘Dad – Martin Barlow.’

‘So you’ve come to see Peter’s astronomical telescope. Are you interested in astronomy?’

‘Yes, sir, I am.’

‘No no no – we’ll have no “sirs” here, my boy! Do you know who Gagarin is?’

‘Of course!’ I laughed.

‘Isn’t he an amazing man?’

I agreed with Peter’s father, although I hadn’t really given Gagarin’s personal qualities much thought. With that, the interview was over.

‘Well, I am glad to meet you, Martin. Off you go, then, and Joy will give you something to eat.’

Mrs Frere was already standing in the hall. She was unmistakably Peter’s mother: her head was roughly triangular, her eyes large, and she had thick, greyish eyebrows. But she wore bright lipstick and looked no more than fifty. You could imagine there might well be something joyful about her, but at the moment she was anxious. She clasped her hands together and almost wrung them.

‘So you are Peter’s friend Martin… Hello, I’m Joy. Would you like me to bring your tea up to you, boys, or would you prefer to have it in the kitchen afterwards?’

‘Oh, we’ll have it later, Mom, thank you,’ said Peter with a flourish of his hand, and set off upstairs.

Peter’s bedroom was intriguing. It smelt less than fresh, and seemed almost that of an adult. For one thing, the bed was a double one, taking up much of the room. On the wall above it was a large poster of Valentina Tereshkova. The right hand wall bore a diagram of the zodiacal constellations with fanciful outlines, and next to it the Periodic Table. Beneath them, on a small trunk, lay a neat pile of the Daily Worker. The darkest corner contained what was evidently Peter’s desk, with a little shelf above it holding a multi-volume encyclopaedia. By the window was the telescope, with a map of the Moon sellotaped to the wall next to it. I was rather disappointed. The refractor was on an altazimuth mounting and proper tripod, but it looked only two inches across and was in black and white plastic. Peter explained that the big window slid back and he did all his observations from here, where he could always follow the Moon. Rightly or wrongly, I assumed this meant he never actually went outside to view the night sky, as I had to.

‘I’m studying the moon in detail,’ Peter told me, ‘because I think someone will make a soft landing on it soon, and I wonder where’s best. My own guess is between the Oceanus Procellarum and Copernicus…’

He showed me a small white cardboard box that he was setting up to measure the brightness of the night sky and individual stars. It featured a variable slit and thin vertical copper wire.

‘The…mm…mathematics of it are rather difficult,’ he said, pointing to an adjacent tome with a battered dust jacket, entitled Astronomer’s Handbook. ‘That belonged to my father.’

After this, we went downstairs, passed the open door to the front room, where Mr Frere was deep in his newspaper, and Peter opened the door into the kitchen.

It was almost stifling, but extremely light as there were windows all round overlooking the garden, which was small and wedge-shaped. Mrs Frere immediately fussed over making our tea. The source of the heat was prominent: a coal-fired range across one wall, complete with scuttle, tongs and fender. But the most unexpected thing was the sight of three medium-sized tortoises propped against the inside of the fender, soaking up the glare of the grate. Two more tortoises, large and very scrawny in the neck, were plodding awkwardly across the kitchen floor, whilst a small yellow one lay beside an open cardboard box snapping at some lettuce. Mrs Frere realised that I was surprised, so promptly explained, as she toasted our teacakes, that they had had the tortoises ‘for a very long time’ and hadn’t ‘the heart’ to put them in the garden shed every winter to hibernate. It was a good tea and I left by the side door, as I always did in future.

It was clear to me that Mrs Frere was concerned about Peter’s friends and that he probably had few. This was dramatically borne out a couple of months later, when I was going home at the end of the morning and passed the large windows of an isolated form-room near the school library. I could clearly see Peter lurching about the room between desks, pursued by three of the worst bullies in the school – ‘Crudmore’ (I don’t remember his real name), Wilkins and Webb, who were shorter and stockier than him. Peter was trying to treat it as a game, emitting mock cries, dodging and even leaping in the air. But one of the bullies was standing by the closed door and hit him in the back whenever he passed, whilst the others punched him as hard as they could whenever they got close enough. When this happened, he uttered real screams. They grabbed his satchel and threw his lunch on the floor. Peter did not see me. Then I caught sight of the faces of other members of his form watching in horror through the pane in the door, and continued on my way fast.

I was shocked, of course. Why had they picked on Peter? Why didn’t he defend himself, seeing as he was so much bigger than them? I realised that he probably annoyed them as a ‘freak’. He was ‘too tall’ for his age, his head was a funny shape, his eyes were not ‘masculine’, yet he could already grow a beard; and he was too clever. Yes, he was eccentric, ‘weird’…

The next day, in the morning break, I went to see a young teacher who had a daughter of my own age and seemed to me protective and likely to do something about the bullying. He was well known to be left-wing and was said to have stood up to the acting headmaster even physically after the latter beat a boy in front of the school. He listened attentively, but said nothing. I couldn’t work out whether he was going to take the case up; also whether his silence betokened that he thought I was just ‘telling on’ the perpetrators. The boys in Peter’s form who had witnessed his torment through the glass told a friend of mine that they had reported it, but it had been going on for weeks in that classroom after the last morning lesson. I also heard on the parental grapevine that Joy Frere was in tears about it and had gone with her invalid husband to complain to the new Head. The ‘Crudmore’-Wilkins-Webb ritual certainly stopped, but I sensed that a different form of bullying took its place: ostracisation because Peter hadn’t ‘stood up for himself’ and everyone knew that his mother, for goodness’ sake, had had to do that for him.

Since he was in the year above me, I had no contact with Peter at school, and never mentioned the bullying to him. There also seemed no call for me to go and look through his telescope, or for him to come and look through mine. I was much more interested in persuading Charlotte Greene, the daughter of the local chemist, that she ought to come and view the moons of Jupiter through my telescope. It was set up on a tripod now in our back garden, and round the eyepiece I thought I might be able to get close enough to her face to kiss it.

It was a bright Saturday in early April when I next visited the Freres. I bumped into Peter as I was coming home from town and he invited me to carry on walking with him and drop in.

We entered by the front door again, and as we passed the front room I could see Mr Frere in his armchair smoking and watching the television.

‘Hello there, my boy!’ he waved at me, and we went straight through to the kitchen. It was full of sunlight and they had the back door open, through which the tortoises were laboriously stumbling in and out.

‘We are letting them into the garden now,’ Peter’s mother explained, ‘but we bring them in again at night in case there is a frost.’

She rapidly provided Peter and me with drinks and biscuits, which we took up to his room.

Because of the size of the bed, and the fact that the trunk with the newspapers practically blocked one side of it and the telescope the other, I hadn’t actually been able to sit down on my first visit. But the telescope on its tripod had now been propped in a corner, and there was a small stool under the window. Sitting down on it, beside the bed, I immediately noticed that the zodiacal figures on the wall opposite had been replaced by a poster of a heavily bearded gentleman with an eyeglass on a cord, and the Periodic Table by a chart of the Russian alphabet.

‘Are you learning Russian?’ I asked.

‘Yes, I’m teaching myself.’ Then he added lightly: ‘I think it’s quite important… I think given the superiority of Soviet science, Russian is likely to become the new lingua franca. But in any case it’s the language of the future.’

I didn’t question this, but made a few jokey remarks about the new headmaster and the quirks of some of our teachers.

‘But what do you expect, Martin? The school is just part of the establishment…the bourgeois establishment. I’m completely alienated from it, but I’ve got to get my O Levels. “The social life from which the worker is shut out is life itself, human activity, human enjoyment, real human existence”.’

I looked at him.

‘Marx,’ he informed me, pointing at the bearded gent. ‘Forwards, 1844.’

‘Ah.’

‘As Marx and Engels say in the Manifesto, “the proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority”…’

I was very impressed, but reacted to the quotes as if they were simply facts Peter was spouting like the astronomical ones earlier. Yet he delivered them differently, somehow. He looked at me from the semi-darkness of his chair, flickered his eyelashes, spoke, then gazed beyond me out through the window.

‘The triumph of socialism and then communism is historically inevitable.’

I stared at him.

‘Marx has proved that scientifically.’

After failing to seduce Charlotte Greene to the science of astronomy – and having exhausted almost all I could do with my telescope – I had become more interested in natural history. So I asked Peter a few questions about the family’s tortoises. They were indeed of different species, he said. Mr Frere had first become interested in the creatures when he fought at Gallipoli (‘like Clement Attlee’). He had watched heavy armoured vehicles lumber over them in the sand, only for the tortoises to get up again and walk away. When I left, Joy Frere was carrying the tortoises, who helplessly worked their legs in the air, from the garden into the kitchen.

It was interesting to talk to Peter every so often, there was no doubt about that, as he was so different from everyone else I knew; in a word, he was unconventional. But I could not work out what it was he ‘knew’ that gave him such an essential apartness, a condescending yet dreamy remoteness that he had not possessed during his astronomical phase, but which made me convinced we weren’t really on the same wavelength. There was an elephant in the room, I sensed, but I couldn’t see it.

At school, the interdict on bullying him stood, I think, but whenever I heard his name mentioned it was with amusement, as if he were a ‘crank’, or lived with his elderly parents in a world that no-one recognised or understood. Some boarders from my form had been over to the next town one Saturday afternoon, wearing uniform of course, and seen Peter in jeans, denim jacket and a red shirt selling the Daily Worker on the street, which they found hilarious. I was going to Germany that summer as part of the school exchange, but Peter wasn’t, as he didn’t ‘do’ German in the Lower Fourth. Nevertheless, I heard the German master telling a colleague in the corridor that he gathered ‘Frere’ was going to East Germany for the equivalent period, which the German master found ‘most peculiar’. My mother mentioned to me later that all the Freres had gone and Mrs Frere had had ‘a wonderful time’.

Altogether, there was no reason for me to visit Peter any more, but I still bumped into him out of school, particularly on Saturdays. One such Saturday in November, by which time I was in the Fourth Form and Peter in the Fifth, I was coming home from the centre of town when I saw him ahead of me in a gabardine mac. I could hardly walk past him, so I drew level.

‘Oh, hello,’ he smiled faintly, and cocked his head at me graciously. ‘I haven’t seen you for ages. Do you want to call round for tea tomorrow? I can’t invite you this afternoon, I’m afraid, we’ve got a meeting.’

I said that I could not make the next day, as it was Remembrance Sunday. I offered no further explanation, because I reasoned that if he knew I was taking part in church services for Remembrance, he might sound off about religion being ‘the opium of the people’ (the only quote from Marx that I knew).

‘Mmm…’ he said. ‘Commemoration of the victims of imperialism!’

‘What?’

‘The so-called “fallen” and “Glorious Dead” in both world wars were the victims of imperialism – which is just the highest stage of capitalism, can’t you see that, Martin?’

‘Well…I can see they were the victims of German and Nazi imperialism, I suppose.’

‘No. They were also the victims of British imperialism. French imperialism. American imperialism. Both wars were wars between capitalist imperialists for the control of economic resources. The proletariat was so weak then that it was manipulated by British, German etcetera bourgeois capitalists into going to war.’

‘You mean the soldiers didn’t know who they were fighting for?’

‘Precisely, my dear Martin: they were fighting on both sides for their masters, the monopolist capitalists…’

‘Hang on, I don’t think you can be right there, Peter, because I know my grandfather joined up to defend his country – to stop it being taken over by the Germans…and my father hates Hitler and the Nazis even now.’

‘No no,’ Peter laughed, ‘they may have thought that’s what they were fighting for, but only the capitalists profited from it. I’m a pacifist. As Marx and Engels said, “the working men have no country” – patriotism is bourgeois indoctrination. When the new proletarian era comes, there will be no more wars. How could there be, after socialist revolutions in every country?’

‘So in Britain, for instance, the people who were killed in two world wars won’t be part of the nation any more, so to speak…they’ll just be victims of the past, kind of lost..? After the revolution, we won’t feel anything for them any more, no pity, no gratitude, no sort of…connection? We won’t remember them?’

‘Pity we shall feel, my father always say that. But pity for them as working men who were duped – who didn’t really know what they were fighting for.’

‘You mean they were duped because they were only “working men”? That’s a bit snooty, isn’t it?’

‘Not at all, Martin. That’s just how it was. There is going to be a proletarian revolution – it’s historically inevitable – but they didn’t know that. “We’ll make Winston Churchill smoke a Woodbine every day, when the Red Revolution comes!”.’

I found Peter’s certainty about these matters unsettling, indeed slightly frightening. After all, could he be right? But it was obviously impossible to argue with him, because his belief in this stuff was now so complete; almost as though it were a religion, I reflected ruefully. I decided not to make any effort to talk to him again. Circumstances, however, soon changed that.

(To be concluded 12 June)

© Patrick Miles, 2023

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Writing’s weird workings…

My fortuitous review of Keith Dewhurst’s excellent novellas, combined with John Pym’s spontaneous submission of his post about Henry James’s story ‘The Death of the Lion’, has suddenly concentrated my mind on my current project and alerted me to things of which I had scarcely been aware. ‘Weirdnesses’, in fact.

Consider: the sheet below, which as usual you can click on to enlarge, dates from 1978 (that’s beyond any doubt). Staggering though I find this now, it appears to be a list of thirty short stories I might write. By that I don’t mean a list of ‘ideas’ for short stories, or even ‘titles’ of short stories, although the latter is certainly what they appear to be. These are reminders to me of the images — settings, events, people, experiences — lodged in my mind and notebooks that I thought might lead to a short story in each case.

But what to make of it now? I’m astonished to see that they were already in two categories: ‘C.T.’ on the left, standing I think for ‘Cambridge Tales’, a title I would never consider using for a collection, and seven headed ‘Other’ on the right. What do the various markings mean? Two of the dark ticks seem to refer to stories that were already published by 1978, the other four ticks to stories that were written by about 1982. But one story on the right, ‘Armageddon’, was incorporated in the ticked ‘White Bow’, and hence crossed out in the list, and another, ‘The Communion’, was also crossed out and never went anywhere, along with eight others — I can’t even remember what they were about. Then what do the red marks mean, or the circles round two stories? To cap it all, given its subject and the different handwriting the last ‘title’ on the left must have been added after 1987, although I don’t make a habit of ‘updating’ past notebooks and I don’t remember adding it.

It’s a time-muddle (chronotopia?) that I have no intention of trying to disentangle. Yet some things emerge from it that intrigue me — even fill me with a kind of wonder. For instance, 18 of these stories have now been written, but mostly with entirely different titles and the 12 that I have written in the past two years seem to have grown well away from their original conceptions. But, frankly, I can hardly believe that I have written those 12 at all, 44 years after the above list was jotted down, and that I’ve written them in ‘only’ two years… Moreover, in the image below you can see from the change in handwriting, spacing, and writing tools (from ink to pencil), that in 2021 I was able to pick up the page and a half of the story ‘Crox’ that I had written in about 1979 (why couldn’t I go any further then?), and carry on where I left off for another three pages to the end.

What has happened between 1978 and the 2020s to make this all possible? Well, as they say, it doesn’t bear thinking about… Perhaps even the contrasting slants of the above lines tell some story lost in my own life’s time. Now I just have to get on with the job of writing the remaining stories. But there is something mysterious, humbling, even miraculous about it all. I would never say with William Blake ‘tho I call them mine, I know that they are not mine’, but at least I know what he meant.

I am now going into writing the last two stories for the collection of 20, which will be called simply Ghoune/White Bow. These two stories will total about 15,000 words (unless things ‘mysteriously’ change), amounting to a quarter of the book, which should be about 120 pages long, and the aim is for Sam&Sam to publish it either just before Christmas or in the New Year. Keith Dewhurst and John Pym have focussed my mind no end (merci!) and I’ve decided to give Calderonia followers a preview of six more stories between now and Christmas, which means that you will have read 13 stories on the blog, but only a third of the book. The first story, to be in two parts and start on 5 June, will be the most recently written and I dedicate it to Mr Pym. It is not a ‘Cambridge Tale’, but an ‘Other’.

Comment Image


ADVERTISEMENT

George Calderon: Edwardian Genius Front Cover

SOME RESPONSES TO GEORGE CALDERON: EDWARDIAN GENIUS 

‘This meticulous yet nimble book is bound to remain the definitive account of Calderon’s life’ Charlotte Jones, The Times Literary Supplement

‘The effort of detection, it must be said, was worth it. The biography is a delight to read.’ Emeritus Professor Laurence Brockliss, The London Magazine

‘It is a masterly synthesis of your own approach with scholarship and very judicious discussion of the evidence.’ Emeritus Professor Catherine Andreyev, historian

‘This comprehensive, meticulously researched and highly readable biography, which the author describes as a “story” rather than an academic biography…’  Michael Pursglove, East-West Review

‘A monumental scholarly masterpiece that gives real insight into how the Edwardians viewed the world.’Arch Tait, Translator of Natalya Rzhevskaya’s Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter

‘The book is written with great assurance and the reader always feels in safe hands. I liked the idea of it being a story and I read it the same way I would read a novel.’ Harvey Pitcher, writer

‘Presents the Edwardian age, and Calderon in particular, as new and forward-looking.’ Emeritus Professor Michael Alexander, in Trinity College, Oxford, Report 2017-18

A review by DAMIAN GRANT appears in the comments to Calderonia’s 7 September post.

A review by JOHN DEWEY appears on Amazon UK.

Click here to purchase my book.

 

Posted in Personal commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment